[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240812112145.GA15197@lst.de>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 13:21:45 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, oe-lkp@...ts.linux.dev, lkp@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@...app.com>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
ying.huang@...el.com, feng.tang@...el.com, fengwei.yin@...el.com
Subject: Re: [linus:master] [nfs] 49b29a573d: filebench.sum_operations/s
-85.6% regression
On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 03:35:20PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> kernel test robot noticed a -85.6% regression of filebench.sum_operations/s on:
I'm not sure what operations this measures. But if it is what I think it
might be, does this regression go away with the following commit (which
already is in mainline)?
commit 39c910a430370fd25d5b5e4b2f4b24581a705499
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Date: Fri Jul 5 07:42:51 2024 +0200
nfs: do not extend writes to the entire folio
Powered by blists - more mailing lists