[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZrnwYrZiHJ11xrlr@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 12:22:10 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
iommu@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
Petr Tesařík <petr@...arici.cz>,
Ramon Fried <ramon@...reality.ai>,
Elad Nachman <enachman@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 RESED 1/2] dma: replace zone_dma_bits by zone_dma_limit
On Sun, Aug 11, 2024 at 10:09:35AM +0300, Baruch Siach wrote:
> From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
>
> Hardware DMA limit might not be power of 2. When RAM range starts above
> 0, say 4GB, DMA limit of 30 bits should end at 5GB. A single high bit
> can not encode this limit.
>
> Use plain address for DMA zone limit.
>
> Since DMA zone can now potentially span beyond 4GB physical limit of
> DMA32, make sure to use DMA zone for GFP_DMA32 allocations in that case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> Co-developed-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il>
> Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il>
You might want to say that no functional change is expected with this
patch. The patch looks fine.
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists