[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <172346406496.772934.9733735582676595864.b4-ty@ellerman.id.au>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 22:01:04 +1000
From: Michael Ellerman <patch-notifications@...erman.id.au>
To: Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@...ux.ibm.com>, Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@...il.com>, Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>, Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>, Naveen N Rao <naveen@...nel.org>, "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Use of_property_present()
On Wed, 31 Jul 2024 13:12:47 -0600, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
> Use of_property_present() to test for property presence rather than
> of_get_property(). This is part of a larger effort to remove callers
> of of_get_property() and similar functions. of_get_property() leaks
> the DT property data pointer which is a problem for dynamically
> allocated nodes which may be freed.
>
>
> [...]
Applied to powerpc/next.
[1/1] powerpc: Use of_property_present()
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/8a93960abed960b9f6097b6471b7fb34120ffc6a
cheers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists