[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <106F3A42-A7CF-402E-B7F7-05AA506C5B7D@toblux.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 14:03:44 +0200
From: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...lux.com>
To: Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@....com>
Cc: "clm@...com" <clm@...com>,
"josef@...icpanda.com" <josef@...icpanda.com>,
"dsterba@...e.com" <dsterba@...e.com>,
"kees@...nel.org" <kees@...nel.org>,
"gustavoars@...nel.org" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
"linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: Annotate structs with __counted_by()
On 12. Aug 2024, at 12:54, Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@....com> wrote:
> On 12.08.24 12:37, Thorsten Blum wrote:
>> Add the __counted_by compiler attribute to the flexible array member
>> stripes to improve access bounds-checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS and
>> CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...lux.com>
>> ---
>> fs/btrfs/volumes.h | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
>> index 37a09ebb34dd..f28fa318036b 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
>> @@ -551,7 +551,7 @@ struct btrfs_io_context {
>> * stripes[data_stripes + 1]: The Q stripe (only for RAID6).
>> */
>> u64 full_stripe_logical;
>> - struct btrfs_io_stripe stripes[];
>> + struct btrfs_io_stripe stripes[] __counted_by(num_stripes);
>> };
>>
>> struct btrfs_device_info {
>> @@ -591,7 +591,7 @@ struct btrfs_chunk_map {
>> int io_width;
>> int num_stripes;
>> int sub_stripes;
>> - struct btrfs_io_stripe stripes[];
>> + struct btrfs_io_stripe stripes[] __counted_by(num_stripes);
>> };
>>
>> #define btrfs_chunk_map_size(n) (sizeof(struct btrfs_chunk_map) + \
>
> Looks good to me,
> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@....com>
>
> Out of curiosity, have you encountered any issues with this patch applied?
I only compile-tested it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists