[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240812125717.413108-5-jdamato@fastly.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 12:57:07 +0000
From: Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mkarsten@...terloo.ca,
amritha.nambiar@...el.com,
sridhar.samudrala@...el.com,
sdf@...ichev.me,
Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org (open list:FILESYSTEMS (VFS and infrastructure)),
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: [RFC net-next 4/5] eventpoll: Trigger napi_busy_loop, if prefer_busy_poll is set
From: Martin Karsten <mkarsten@...terloo.ca>
Setting prefer_busy_poll now leads to an effectively nonblocking
iteration though napi_busy_loop, even when busy_poll_usecs is 0.
Signed-off-by: Martin Karsten <mkarsten@...terloo.ca>
Co-developed-by: Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>
Signed-off-by: Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>
Tested-by: Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>
Tested-by: Martin Karsten <mkarsten@...terloo.ca>
---
fs/eventpoll.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/eventpoll.c b/fs/eventpoll.c
index f53ca4f7fced..cc47f72005ed 100644
--- a/fs/eventpoll.c
+++ b/fs/eventpoll.c
@@ -420,7 +420,9 @@ static bool busy_loop_ep_timeout(unsigned long start_time,
static bool ep_busy_loop_on(struct eventpoll *ep)
{
- return !!ep->busy_poll_usecs || net_busy_loop_on();
+ return !!READ_ONCE(ep->busy_poll_usecs) ||
+ READ_ONCE(ep->prefer_busy_poll) ||
+ net_busy_loop_on();
}
static bool ep_busy_loop_end(void *p, unsigned long start_time)
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists