lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46493cf7-6885-4c30-965b-29c158599c58@roeck-us.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 06:21:14 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
 Farouk Bouabid <farouk.bouabid@...rry.de>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@...rry.de>,
 Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
 Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/8] hwmon: (amc6821) add support for tsd,mule

On 8/12/24 04:38, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 31/07/2024 17:12, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 03:27:50PM +0200, Farouk Bouabid wrote:
>>> Theobroma Systems Mule is an MCU that emulates a set of I2C devices,
>>> among which is an amc6821 and other devices that are reachable through
>>> an I2C-mux.
>>>
>>> The devices on the mux can be selected by writing the appropriate device
>>> number to an I2C config register (amc6821: reg 0xff)
>>>
>>> Implement "tsd,mule" compatible to instantiate the I2C-mux platform device
>>> when probing the amc6821.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Farouk Bouabid <farouk.bouabid@...rry.de>
>>> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
>>
>> Applied.
> 
> Eh, there is undocumented dependency on I2C here. Next has warning
> because of this.
> 
> Farouk, please *always mention* the dependencies between patches.
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 
> 
Sorry, I wasn't aware that all bindings have to be in the tree before I apply
patches, and I somehow had the apparently wrong impression that the bindings
were approved. I'll drop the two patches (this one and the DT patch for
amc6821). Someone may need to remind me to re-apply them after all
pre-dependencies are in the tree.

Guenter


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ