[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <25b65e9ef1cae59a8366532cc8db576b@manjaro.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 04:46:27 +0200
From: Dragan Simic <dsimic@...jaro.org>
To: Icenowy Zheng <uwu@...nowy.me>
Cc: linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev, wens@...e.org, jernej.skrabec@...il.com,
samuel@...lland.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, wenst@...omium.org,
broonie@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: allwinner: Add GPU thermal trips to the SoC
dtsi for A64
Hello Icenowy,
On 2024-08-12 04:40, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> 在 2024-08-12星期一的 04:00 +0200,Dragan Simic写道:
>> Add thermal trips for the two GPU thermal sensors found in the
>> Allwinner A64.
>> There's only one GPU OPP defined since the commit 1428f0c19f9c
>> ("arm64: dts:
>> allwinner: a64: Run GPU at 432 MHz"), so defining only the critical
>> thermal
>> trips makes sense for the A64's two GPU thermal zones.
>>
>> Having these critical thermal trips defined ensures that no hot spots
>> develop
>> inside the SoC die that exceed the maximum junction temperature.
>> That might
>> have been possible before, although quite unlikely, because the CPU
>> and GPU
>> portions of the SoC are packed closely inside the SoC, so the
>> overheating GPU
>> would inevitably result in the heat soaking into the CPU portion of
>> the SoC,
>> causing the CPU thermal sensor to return high readings and trigger
>> the CPU
>> critical thermal trips. However, it's better not to rely on the heat
>> soak
>> and have the critical GPU thermal trips properly defined instead.
>>
>> While there, remove a few spotted comments that are rather redundant,
>> because
>> it's pretty much obvious what units are used in those places.
>
> This should be another individual patch, I think.
Perhaps, which I already thought about, but it might also be best
to simply drop the removal of those redundant comments entirely.
Let's also see what will other people say.
>> Signed-off-by: Dragan Simic <dsimic@...jaro.org>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi | 22 ++++++++++++++---
>> --
>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
>> index e868ca5ae753..bc5d3a2e6c98 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
>> @@ -212,7 +212,6 @@ timer {
>>
>> thermal-zones {
>> cpu_thermal: cpu0-thermal {
>> - /* milliseconds */
>
> The unit of a 0 isn't not so obvious I think, so I suggest to keep
> this.
Quite frankly, I think it should be obvious to anyone tackling
the thermal zones and trips.
>> polling-delay-passive = <0>;
>> polling-delay = <0>;
>> thermal-sensors = <&ths 0>;
>> @@ -236,40 +235,51 @@ map1 {
>>
>> trips {
>> cpu_alert0: cpu-alert0 {
>> - /* milliCelsius */
>> temperature = <75000>;
>> hysteresis = <2000>;
>> type = "passive";
>> };
>>
>> cpu_alert1: cpu-alert1 {
>> - /* milliCelsius */
>> temperature = <90000>;
>> hysteresis = <2000>;
>> type = "hot";
>> };
>>
>> cpu_crit: cpu-crit {
>> - /* milliCelsius */
>> temperature = <110000>;
>> hysteresis = <2000>;
>> type = "critical";
>> };
>> };
>> };
>>
>> gpu0_thermal: gpu0-thermal {
>> - /* milliseconds */
>> polling-delay-passive = <0>;
>> polling-delay = <0>;
>> thermal-sensors = <&ths 1>;
>> +
>> + trips {
>> + gpu0_crit: gpu0-crit {
>> + temperature = <110000>;
>> + hysteresis = <2000>;
>> + type = "critical";
>> + };
>> + };
>> };
>>
>> gpu1_thermal: gpu1-thermal {
>> - /* milliseconds */
>> polling-delay-passive = <0>;
>> polling-delay = <0>;
>> thermal-sensors = <&ths 2>;
>> +
>> + trips {
>> + gpu1_crit: gpu1-crit {
>> + temperature = <110000>;
>> + hysteresis = <2000>;
>> + type = "critical";
>> + };
>> + };
>> };
>> };
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists