[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhTVO1-KDBisD9sZjG+5mZUiSy6SOE=6c5_rGp5ApoC77A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 11:00:28 -0400
From: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
selinux@...r.kernel.org, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@...hat.com>, "Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs,security: Fix file_set_fowner LSM hook inconsistencies
On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 10:49 AM Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net> wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h b/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h
> index 44488b1ab9a9..974bcc1c8f8f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h
> @@ -196,7 +196,6 @@ LSM_HOOK(int, 0, file_mprotect, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> LSM_HOOK(int, 0, file_lock, struct file *file, unsigned int cmd)
> LSM_HOOK(int, 0, file_fcntl, struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
> unsigned long arg)
> -LSM_HOOK(void, LSM_RET_VOID, file_set_fowner, struct file *file)
As I mentioned in the other thread, I don't want to see the
file_set_owner hook removed at this point in time. I'm open to the
idea of moving it around, but as of right now I think it is important
to keep it around.
> LSM_HOOK(int, 0, file_send_sigiotask, struct task_struct *tsk,
> struct fown_struct *fown, int sig)
> LSM_HOOK(int, 0, file_receive, struct file *file)
--
paul-moore.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists