[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKgT0UezjgRX9QUWkee_p8KVQQa1va12k2CaGJeOYrr5LGg4YQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 08:11:03 -0700
From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
To: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v13 00/14] Replace page_frag with page_frag_cache
for sk_page_frag()
On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 4:30 AM Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> On 2024/8/8 20:37, Yunsheng Lin wrote:
>
> ...
>
> >
> > CC: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
> >
> > 1. https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240228093013.8263-1-linyunsheng@huawei.com/
> >
> > Change log:
> > V13:
> > 1. Move page_frag_test from mm/ to tools/testing/selftest/mm
> > 2. Use ptr_ring to replace ptr_pool for page_frag_test.c
> > 3. Retest based on the new testing ko, which shows a big different
> > result than using ptr_pool.
>
> Hi, Davem & Jakub & Paolo
> It seems the state of this patchset is changed to 'Deferred' in the
> patchwork, as the info regarding the state in 'Documentation/process/
> maintainer-netdev.rst':
>
> Deferred patch needs to be reposted later, usually due to dependency
> or because it was posted for a closed tree
>
> Obviously it was not the a closed tree reason here, I guess it was the dependency
> reason casuing the 'Deferred' here? I am not sure if I understand what sort of
> dependency this patchset is running into? It would be good to mention what need
> to be done avoid the kind of dependency too.
>
>
> Hi, Alexander
> The v13 mainly address your comments about the page_fage_test module.
> It seems the your main comment about this patchset is about the new API
> naming now, and it seems there was no feedback in previous version for
> about a week:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/ca6be29e-ab53-4673-9624-90d41616a154@huawei.com/
>
> If there is still disagreement about the new API naming or other things, it
> would be good to continue the discussion, so that we can have better
> understanding of each other's main concern and better idea might come up too,
> like the discussion about new layout for 'struct page_frag_cache' and the
> new refactoring in patch 8.
Sorry for not getting to this sooner. I have been travelling for the
last week and a half. I just got home on Sunday and I am suffering
from a pretty bad bout of jet lag as I am overcoming a 12.5 hour time
change. The earliest I can probably get to this for review would be
tomorrow morning (8/14 in the AM PDT) as my calendar has me fully
booked with meetings most of today.
Thanks,
- Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists