linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] sched/deadline: nanoseconds clarifications

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZruDkw2XB8iXMepz@jlelli-thinkpadt14gen4.remote.csb>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 17:02:27 +0100
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
To: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@....com>
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	rafael@...nel.org, vincent.guittot@...aro.org, qyousef@...alina.io,
	peterz@...radead.org, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
	rostedt@...dmis.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] sched/deadline: nanoseconds clarifications

Hi,

On 13/08/24 15:43, Christian Loehle wrote:
> A couple of clarifications about the time units for the deadline
> parameters uncovered in the discussion around
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/3c726cf5-0c94-4cc6-aff0-a453d840d452@arm.com/
> 
> While at it I changed the documentation example to chrt instead
> of the schedtool fork.
> 
> No functional changes.

Looks good to me!

At least for docs/uapi,

Acked-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>

Thanks,
Juri