linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/6] Extend pmu_counters

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZruZjhSRqo7Zx_1r@google.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 10:36:14 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@...gle.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@...gle.com>, 
	Jinrong Liang <ljr.kernel@...il.com>, Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>, 
	Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@...gle.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, 
	Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Extend pmu_counters_test to AMD CPUs

On Tue, Aug 13, 2024, Colton Lewis wrote:
> (I was positive I had sent this already, but I couldn't find it on the
> mailing list to reply to and ask for reviews.)

You did[*], it's sitting in my todo folder.  Two things.

1. Err on the side of caution when potentially resending, and tag everything
RESEND.  Someone seeing a RESEND version without having seen the original version
is no big deal.  But someone seeing two copies of the same patches/emails can get
quite confusing.

2. Something is funky in your send flow.  The original posing says 0/7 in the
cover letter, but there are only 6 patches.

[*] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240802182240.1916675-1-coltonlewis@google.com