[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZrucyCn8rfTrKeNE@ls.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 10:50:00 -0700
From: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
To: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com,
seanjc@...gle.com, isaku.yamahata@...el.com,
rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com, michael.roth@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: x86: Check hypercall's exit to userspace
generically
On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 01:12:55PM +0800,
Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> Check whether a KVM hypercall needs to exit to userspace or not based on
> hypercall_exit_enabled field of struct kvm_arch.
>
> Userspace can request a hypercall to exit to userspace for handling by
> enable KVM_CAP_EXIT_HYPERCALL and the enabled hypercall will be set in
> hypercall_exit_enabled. Make the check code generic based on it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 4 ++--
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.h | 7 +++++++
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index af6c8cf6a37a..6e16c9751af7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -10226,8 +10226,8 @@ int kvm_emulate_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> cpl = kvm_x86_call(get_cpl)(vcpu);
>
> ret = __kvm_emulate_hypercall(vcpu, nr, a0, a1, a2, a3, op_64_bit, cpl);
> - if (nr == KVM_HC_MAP_GPA_RANGE && !ret)
> - /* MAP_GPA tosses the request to the user space. */
> + if (!ret && is_kvm_hc_exit_enabled(vcpu->kvm, nr))
> + /* The hypercall is requested to exit to userspace. */
> return 0;
>
> if (!op_64_bit)
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
> index 50596f6f8320..0cbec76b42e6 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
> @@ -547,4 +547,11 @@ int kvm_sev_es_string_io(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int size,
> unsigned int port, void *data, unsigned int count,
> int in);
>
> +static inline bool is_kvm_hc_exit_enabled(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long hc_nr)
> +{
> + if(WARN_ON_ONCE(hc_nr >= sizeof(kvm->arch.hypercall_exit_enabled) * 8))
> + return false;
Is this to detect potential bug? Maybe
BUILD_BUG_ON(__builtin_constant_p(hc_nr) &&
!(BIT(hc_nr) & KVM_EXIT_HYPERCALL_VALID_MASK));
Overkill?
--
Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists