[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zru2wILO6RwB1d-u@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 09:40:48 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...a.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] workqueue: Make wq_affn_dfl_set() use
wq_online_cpumask
Hello,
On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 12:23:32PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> > @@ -6909,18 +6909,16 @@ static int wq_affn_dfl_set(const char *val, const struct kernel_param *kp)
> > if (affn == WQ_AFFN_DFL)
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > - cpus_read_lock();
> > mutex_lock(&wq_pool_mutex);
> >
> > wq_affn_dfl = affn;
> >
> > list_for_each_entry(wq, &workqueues, list) {
> > - for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
> > + for_each_cpu(cpu, wq_online_cpumask)
> > unbound_wq_update_pwq(wq, cpu);
> > }
>
> I think it should be for_each_possible_cpu() for updating the pwqs.
Can you send a patch?
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists