[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZrqsqsCtKwfG4Q5B@ghost>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 17:45:30 -0700
From: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@...osinc.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@...ive.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>, Evan Green <evan@...osinc.com>,
Andy Chiu <andy.chiu@...ive.com>,
Jessica Clarke <jrtc27@...c27.com>,
Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/13] riscv: Add support for xtheadvector
On Fri, Aug 09, 2024 at 11:31:15PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 05:31:36PM -0700, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
> > xtheadvector is a custom extension that is based upon riscv vector
> > version 0.7.1 [1]. All of the vector routines have been modified to
> > support this alternative vector version based upon whether xtheadvector
> > was determined to be supported at boot.
> >
> > vlenb is not supported on the existing xtheadvector hardware, so a
> > devicetree property thead,vlenb is added to provide the vlenb to Linux.
> >
> > There is a new hwprobe key RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_VENDOR_EXT_THEAD_0 that is
> > used to request which thead vendor extensions are supported on the
> > current platform. This allows future vendors to allocate hwprobe keys
> > for their vendor.
> >
> > Support for xtheadvector is also added to the vector kselftests.
>
> So uh, since noone seems to have brought it up, in the light of the issues
> with thead's vector implementation, (https://ghostwriteattack.com/) do we
> want to enable it at all?
I can make it clear in the kconfig that xtheadvector is succeptible to
this attack and that it should be enabled with caution. I think we
should let people that understand the risk to enable it.
- Charlie
Powered by blists - more mailing lists