lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240813225917.GD10328@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 00:59:17 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: mingo@...nel.org, tj@...nel.org, void@...ifault.com
Cc: juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
	dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
	mgorman@...e.de, vschneid@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	joelaf@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] sched: Add pick_task(.core)

On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 12:25:57AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> In order to distinguish between a regular vs a core pick_task()
> invocation, add a boolean argument.
> 
> Notably SCX seems to need this, since its core pick

... and clearly I never finished that sentence. But mostly it has extra
bits on for sched_core that are not needed in the normal case, and since
we now use pick_task() per default, it needs to know.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ