linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/86] 6.1.104-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2024081350-reconcile-rubble-6bb3@gregkh>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 08:08:01 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@...ian.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
	patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
	jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
	sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
	conor@...nel.org, allen.lkml@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org,
	Akemi Yagi <toracat@...epo.org>,
	Hardik Garg <hargar@...ux.microsoft.com>,
	Quentin Monnet <qmo@...nel.org>, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/86] 6.1.104-rc1 review

On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 07:49:34PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> On Sun, Aug 11, 2024 at 05:40:58PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 11, 2024 at 05:03:45PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > > Hi Greg,
> > > 
> > > On Sun, Aug 11, 2024 at 12:09:30PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 10:35:11PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > > > > Hi Greg,
> > > > > 
> > > > > On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 04:59:39PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.104 release.
> > > > > > There are 86 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > > > let me know.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Responses should be made by Fri, 09 Aug 2024 15:00:24 +0000.
> > > > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > > > 
> > > > > 6.1.103 had the regression of bpftool not building, due to a missing
> > > > > backport:
> > > > > 
> > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/stable/v8lqgl$15bq$1@ciao.gmane.io/
> > > > > 
> > > > > The problem is that da5f8fd1f0d3 ("bpftool: Mount bpffs when pinmaps
> > > > > path not under the bpffs") was backported to 6.1.103 but there is no
> > > > > defintion of create_and_mount_bpffs_dir(). 
> > > > > 
> > > > > it was suggested to revert the commit completely.
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks for this, I'll fix it up after this release.
> > > 
> > > Thanks! Note today Quentin Monnet proposed another solution by
> > > cherry-picking two commits:
> > > 
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/stable/67bfcb8a-e00e-47b2-afe2-970a60e4a173@kernel.org/
> > 
> > They don't apply cleanly, so I'll just add a revert...
> 
> FYI: Just realized that the breaking commit was as well queued for
> older series 5.15.y, 5.10.y and 5.4.y, so that needs to be dropped
> from those queues as well.

Good catch, I'll go drop it now from them, thanks!

greg k-h