[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <84eaddb1-0987-d44f-cba0-48e519f93fed@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 11:17:13 +0300 (EEST)
From: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Alexander Dahl <ada@...rsis.com>
cc: Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe@....org>,
Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...tlin.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-serial <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: atmel_serial: use the correct RTS flag.
On Tue, 13 Aug 2024, Alexander Dahl wrote:
> Hello Mathieu,
>
> Am Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 08:06:37AM +0200 schrieb Mathieu Othacehe:
> > In RS485 mode, the RTS pin is driven high by hardware when the transmitter
> > is operating. This behaviour cannot be changed. This means that the driver
> > should claim that it supports SER_RS485_RTS_ON_SEND and not
> > SER_RS485_RTS_AFTER_SEND.
> >
> > Otherwise, when configuring the port with the SER_RS485_RTS_ON_SEND, one
> > get the following warning:
> >
> > kern.warning kernel: atmel_usart_serial atmel_usart_serial.2.auto:
> > ttyS1 (1): invalid RTS setting, using RTS_AFTER_SEND instead
>
> I've seen this warning already, when migrating a sam9x60 based board
> from LTS kernel 6.1 to 6.6, so thanks for taking care of this.
>
> I can confirm after applying the patch on top of 6.6.44 the warning is
> gone, and RS-485 communication still works on our platform, so …
>
> Tested-by: Alexander Dahl <ada@...rsis.com>
>
> Does this deserve a Fixes tag for the change which introduced struct
> serial_rs485 to the atmel serial driver? Then it should be this:
>
> Fixes: af47c491e3c7 ("serial: atmel: Fill in rs485_supported")
>
> Greets
> Alex
>
> > which is contradictory with what's really happening.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe@....org>
This got (more) broken by one of the changes made into
uart_sanitize_serial_rs485() even if af47c491e3c7 used a wrong flag and
must be fixed. The code in af47c491e3c7:uart_sanitize_serial_rs485()
picks RTS_ON_SEND if no RTS_*_SEND flag is specified by the userspace
code.
The behavior change was due to 4afeced55baa ("serial: core: fix sanitizing
check for RTS settings") that enforced flags differently (4afeced55baa
makes very much sense but because of the wrong flag in atmel driver, it
ended up breaking atmel).
--
i.
> > ---
> > drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c b/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c
> > index 0a90964d6d107..09b246c9e389e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c
> > +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c
> > @@ -2514,7 +2514,7 @@ static const struct uart_ops atmel_pops = {
> > };
> >
> > static const struct serial_rs485 atmel_rs485_supported = {
> > - .flags = SER_RS485_ENABLED | SER_RS485_RTS_AFTER_SEND | SER_RS485_RX_DURING_TX,
> > + .flags = SER_RS485_ENABLED | SER_RS485_RTS_ON_SEND | SER_RS485_RX_DURING_TX,
> > .delay_rts_before_send = 1,
> > .delay_rts_after_send = 1,
> > };
> > --
> > 2.45.2
> >
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists