linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 1/4] rpmb: add Replay Protected Memory Block (RPMB) subsystem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2024081346-riveting-unwired-d9dc@gregkh>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 13:36:08 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
	op-tee@...ts.trustedfirmware.org,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
	Shyam Saini <shyamsaini@...ux.microsoft.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Jerome Forissier <jerome.forissier@...aro.org>,
	Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>,
	Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>,
	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Manuel Traut <manut@...ka.net>,
	Mikko Rapeli <mikko.rapeli@...aro.org>,
	Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@...el.com>,
	Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/4] rpmb: add Replay Protected Memory Block (RPMB)
 subsystem

On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 01:26:18PM +0200, Jens Wiklander wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 11:29 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 03:31:24PM +0200, Jens Wiklander wrote:
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/drivers/misc/rpmb-core.c
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,233 @@
> > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> >
> > Fine, but:
> >
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/include/linux/rpmb.h
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
> > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause OR GPL-2.0 */
> >
> > Really?
> >
> > Why?  I need lots of documentation and a lawyer sign off for why this is
> > a dual license for a file that is obviously only for internal Linux
> > kernel stuff.
> 
> I'm sorry that was added via one of the patch sets before mine. I'll
> revert to GPL-2.0 only.

Please be sure to get proper legal approval to change the license of
code not written by you :)