lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240814-virtuell-diktieren-a08337b312fb@brauner>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 16:50:54 +0200
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, 
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, 
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, 
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the bpf-next tree

On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 02:41:57AM GMT, Al Viro wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 11:25:04AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >  	if (at_flags & AT_EMPTY_PATH && vfs_empty_path(dfd, pathname)) {
> >  		CLASS(fd, f)(dfd);
> > -		if (!f.file)
> > +		if (!fd_file(f))
> 
> 		if (fd_empty(f))
> 
> actually, and similar for the rest of it.  Anyway, that'll need to be
> sorted out in vfs/vfs.git; sorry about the delay.

You should already have a never rebase branch for the basic
infrastructure. I can just merge that. But I'll just make my usual note
and just provide the required fixups when I send Linus a pr. That'll
work too. /me trying not to have his brain melted by the heat.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ