| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <ZrzTFZeh7WDPQZJF@p14s>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 09:53:57 -0600
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
To: Beleswar Padhi <b-padhi@...com>
Cc: andersson@...nel.org, afd@...com, hnagalla@...com, u-kumar1@...com,
s-anna@...com, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] remoteproc: k3-dsp: Acquire mailbox handle during
probe routine
On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 01:11:27PM +0530, Beleswar Padhi wrote:
> Acquire the mailbox handle during device probe and do not release handle
> in stop/detach routine or error paths. This removes the redundant
> requests for mbox handle later during rproc start/attach. This also
> allows to defer remoteproc driver's probe if mailbox is not probed yet.
>
> Signed-off-by: Beleswar Padhi <b-padhi@...com>
> Acked-by: Andrew Davis <afd@...com>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c | 80 +++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c
> index a22d41689a7d..9009367e2891 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c
> @@ -115,6 +115,10 @@ static void k3_dsp_rproc_mbox_callback(struct mbox_client *client, void *data)
> const char *name = kproc->rproc->name;
> u32 msg = omap_mbox_message(data);
>
> + /* Do not forward messages from a detached core */
> + if (kproc->rproc->state == RPROC_DETACHED)
> + return;
> +
> dev_dbg(dev, "mbox msg: 0x%x\n", msg);
>
> switch (msg) {
> @@ -155,6 +159,10 @@ static void k3_dsp_rproc_kick(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid)
> mbox_msg_t msg = (mbox_msg_t)vqid;
> int ret;
>
> + /* Do not forward messages to a detached core */
> + if (kproc->rproc->state == RPROC_DETACHED)
> + return;
> +
> /* send the index of the triggered virtqueue in the mailbox payload */
> ret = mbox_send_message(kproc->mbox, (void *)msg);
> if (ret < 0)
> @@ -230,12 +238,9 @@ static int k3_dsp_rproc_request_mbox(struct rproc *rproc)
> client->knows_txdone = false;
>
> kproc->mbox = mbox_request_channel(client, 0);
> - if (IS_ERR(kproc->mbox)) {
> - ret = -EBUSY;
> - dev_err(dev, "mbox_request_channel failed: %ld\n",
> - PTR_ERR(kproc->mbox));
> - return ret;
> - }
> + if (IS_ERR(kproc->mbox))
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(kproc->mbox),
> + "mbox_request_channel failed\n");
>
> /*
> * Ping the remote processor, this is only for sanity-sake for now;
> @@ -315,32 +320,23 @@ static int k3_dsp_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc)
> u32 boot_addr;
> int ret;
>
> - ret = k3_dsp_rproc_request_mbox(rproc);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> -
> boot_addr = rproc->bootaddr;
> if (boot_addr & (kproc->data->boot_align_addr - 1)) {
> dev_err(dev, "invalid boot address 0x%x, must be aligned on a 0x%x boundary\n",
> boot_addr, kproc->data->boot_align_addr);
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - goto put_mbox;
> + return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> dev_dbg(dev, "booting DSP core using boot addr = 0x%x\n", boot_addr);
> ret = ti_sci_proc_set_config(kproc->tsp, boot_addr, 0, 0);
> if (ret)
> - goto put_mbox;
> + return ret;
>
> ret = k3_dsp_rproc_release(kproc);
> if (ret)
> - goto put_mbox;
> + return ret;
>
> return 0;
> -
> -put_mbox:
> - mbox_free_channel(kproc->mbox);
> - return ret;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -353,8 +349,6 @@ static int k3_dsp_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
> {
> struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv;
>
> - mbox_free_channel(kproc->mbox);
> -
> k3_dsp_rproc_reset(kproc);
>
> return 0;
> @@ -363,42 +357,22 @@ static int k3_dsp_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
> /*
> * Attach to a running DSP remote processor (IPC-only mode)
> *
> - * This rproc attach callback only needs to request the mailbox, the remote
> - * processor is already booted, so there is no need to issue any TI-SCI
> - * commands to boot the DSP core. This callback is invoked only in IPC-only
> - * mode.
> + * This rproc attach callback is a NOP. The remote processor is already booted,
> + * and all required resources have been acquired during probe routine, so there
> + * is no need to issue any TI-SCI commands to boot the DSP core. This callback
> + * is invoked only in IPC-only mode and exists because rproc_validate() checks
> + * for its existence.
> */
> -static int k3_dsp_rproc_attach(struct rproc *rproc)
> -{
> - struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv;
> - struct device *dev = kproc->dev;
> - int ret;
> -
> - ret = k3_dsp_rproc_request_mbox(rproc);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> -
> - dev_info(dev, "DSP initialized in IPC-only mode\n");
> - return 0;
> -}
> +static int k3_dsp_rproc_attach(struct rproc *rproc) { return 0; }
>
> /*
> * Detach from a running DSP remote processor (IPC-only mode)
> *
> - * This rproc detach callback performs the opposite operation to attach callback
> - * and only needs to release the mailbox, the DSP core is not stopped and will
> - * be left to continue to run its booted firmware. This callback is invoked only
> - * in IPC-only mode.
> + * This rproc detach callback is a NOP. The DSP core is not stopped and will be
> + * left to continue to run its booted firmware. This callback is invoked only in
> + * IPC-only mode and exists for sanity sake.
> */
> -static int k3_dsp_rproc_detach(struct rproc *rproc)
> -{
> - struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv;
> - struct device *dev = kproc->dev;
> -
> - mbox_free_channel(kproc->mbox);
> - dev_info(dev, "DSP deinitialized in IPC-only mode\n");
> - return 0;
> -}
> +static int k3_dsp_rproc_detach(struct rproc *rproc) { return 0; }
Same comment as the previous patch.
Thanks,
Mathieu
>
> /*
> * This function implements the .get_loaded_rsc_table() callback and is used
> @@ -697,6 +671,10 @@ static int k3_dsp_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> kproc->dev = dev;
> kproc->data = data;
>
> + ret = k3_dsp_rproc_request_mbox(rproc);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> kproc->ti_sci = devm_ti_sci_get_by_phandle(dev, "ti,sci");
> if (IS_ERR(kproc->ti_sci))
> return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(kproc->ti_sci),
> @@ -789,6 +767,8 @@ static void k3_dsp_rproc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (ret)
> dev_err(dev, "failed to detach proc (%pe)\n", ERR_PTR(ret));
> }
> +
> + mbox_free_channel(kproc->mbox);
> }
>
> static const struct k3_dsp_mem_data c66_mems[] = {
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists