linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] clk: bd718x7: Enable the possibility to mark the clock as critical

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOf5uwm3p5AJXL9w7hQtqz05hDpQ_-CQArm0z6kAehj7OxK1Mw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 18:00:47 +0200
From: Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi <michael@...rulasolutions.com>
To: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, 
	"open list:COMMON CLK FRAMEWORK" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@...rulasolutions.com>, linux-amarula@...rulasolutions.com, 
	Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] clk: bd718x7: Enable the possibility to mark the
 clock as critical

Hi Stephen

On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 7:26 AM Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> On 6/5/22 19:57, Michael Trimarchi wrote:
> > If the clock is used to generate the osc_32k, we need to mark
> > as critical. clock-critical has no binding description at the moment
> > but it's defined in linux kernel
> >
> > bd71847: pmic@4b {
> > ...
> >       rohm,reset-snvs-powered;
> >
> >       #clock-cells = <0>;
> >       clock-critical = <1>;
> >       clocks = <&osc_32k 0>;
> >       clock-output-names = "clk-32k-out";
> > ...
> > }
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Trimarchi <michael@...rulasolutions.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/clk/clk-bd718x7.c | 4 ++++
>
> //snip
>
> > @@ -100,6 +101,9 @@ static int bd71837_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >
> >       parent_clk = of_clk_get_parent_name(parent->of_node, 0);
> >
> > +     of_clk_detect_critical(dev->of_node, 0, &flags);
>
> Purely judging the kerneldoc for of_clk_detect_critical - you may have
> hard time getting this accepted.
>
> I think you're working on a very valid problem though. Maybe you could
> see if you could align your effort with Marek?
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220517235919.200375-1-marex@denx.de/T/#m52d6d0831bf43d5f293e35cb27f3021f278d0564
>

Old thread but same problem. Is there any way to make this acceptable?
any suggestion?

Michael

> Best Regards
>         -- Matti
>
> --
> Matti Vaittinen
> Linux kernel developer at ROHM Semiconductors
> Oulu Finland
>
> ~~ When things go utterly wrong vim users can always type :help! ~~
>
> Discuss - Estimate - Plan - Report and finally accomplish this:
> void do_work(int time) __attribute__ ((const));



-- 
Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
Co-Founder & Chief Executive Officer
M. +39 347 913 2170
michael@...rulasolutions.com
__________________________________

Amarula Solutions BV
Joop Geesinkweg 125, 1114 AB, Amsterdam, NL
T. +31 (0)85 111 9172
info@...rulasolutions.com
www.amarulasolutions.com