[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZrzY8Kk-1PwZlezI@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 17:18:56 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@...ive.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@...nel.org>,
"Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
Ryo Takakura <takakura@...inux.co.jp>,
Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@...hat.com>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Fix KASAN random tag seed initialization
On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 02:09:53AM -0700, Samuel Holland wrote:
> Currently, kasan_init_sw_tags() is called before setup_per_cpu_areas(),
> so per_cpu(prng_state, cpu) accesses the same address regardless of the
> value of "cpu", and the same seed value gets copied to the percpu area
> for every CPU. Fix this by moving the call to smp_prepare_boot_cpu(),
> which is the first architecture hook after setup_per_cpu_areas().
Even with the fix, given the lower resolution of get_cycles(), there's a
good chance that we still have the same seed on all CPUs. If we want
separate seeds, a better bet would be to initialise each CPU separately
via the secondary_start_kernel() path. I'll let the KASAN people comment
on whether that's important.
--
Catalin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists