[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <03b93d98-5722-4592-9346-30a3b4f95d1f@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 20:01:09 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>, Lukasz Luba
<lukasz.luba@....com>, Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] memory: ti-aemif: simplify with scoped for each OF
child loop
On 14/08/2024 18:55, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 15:34:03 +0200
> Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>
>> Use scoped for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped() when iterating over
>> device nodes to make code a bit simpler.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> Nothing wrong with this patch, but I think you can add a precusor
> that will make this neater.
>
> Jonathan
>
>> ---
>> drivers/memory/ti-aemif.c | 13 ++++---------
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/memory/ti-aemif.c b/drivers/memory/ti-aemif.c
>> index e192db9e0e4b..cd2945d4ec18 100644
>> --- a/drivers/memory/ti-aemif.c
>> +++ b/drivers/memory/ti-aemif.c
>> @@ -330,7 +330,6 @@ static int aemif_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> int ret = -ENODEV;
>> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
>> - struct device_node *child_np;
>> struct aemif_device *aemif;
>> struct aemif_platform_data *pdata;
>> struct of_dev_auxdata *dev_lookup;
>> @@ -374,12 +373,10 @@ static int aemif_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> * functions iterate over these nodes and update the cs data
>> * array.
>> */
>> - for_each_available_child_of_node(np, child_np) {
>> + for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped(np, child_np) {
>> ret = of_aemif_parse_abus_config(pdev, child_np);
>> - if (ret < 0) {
>> - of_node_put(child_np);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> goto error;
> I'd precede this patch with use of
> devm_clk_get_enabled()
>
> That would avoid what looks like potential mixed devm and not issues
> and let you return here.
Yep, that would be useful.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists