[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6dfe3817-702e-40bd-8bdb-0048997c9b01@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 21:01:58 -0700
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To: James Morse <james.morse@....com>, <x86@...nel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, H Peter Anvin
<hpa@...or.com>, Babu Moger <Babu.Moger@....com>,
<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>, D Scott Phillips OS
<scott@...amperecomputing.com>, <carl@...amperecomputing.com>,
<lcherian@...vell.com>, <bobo.shaobowang@...wei.com>,
<tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com>, <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>, Jamie Iles
<quic_jiles@...cinc.com>, Xin Hao <xhao@...ux.alibaba.com>,
<peternewman@...gle.com>, <dfustini@...libre.com>, <amitsinght@...vell.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, Rex Nie <rex.nie@...uarmicro.com>, Dave
Martin <dave.martin@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 19/39] x86/resctrl: Add
resctrl_arch_is_evt_configurable() to abstract BMEC
Hi James,
On 8/2/24 10:28 AM, James Morse wrote:
> When BMEC is supported the resctrl event can be configured in a number
> of ways. This depends on architecture support. rdt_get_mon_l3_config()
> modifies the struct mon_evt and calls mbm_config_rftype_init() to create
> the files that allow the configuration.
>
> Splitting this into separate architecture and filesystem parts would
> require the struct mon_evt and mbm_config_rftype_init() to be exposed.
>
> Instead, add resctrl_arch_is_evt_configurable(), and use this from
> resctrl_mon_resource_init() to initialise struct mon_evt and call
> mbm_config_rftype_init().
> resctrl_arch_is_evt_configurable() calls rdt_cpu_has() so it doesn't
> obviously benefit from being inlined. Putting it in core.c will allow
> rdt_cpu_has() to eventually become static.
>
> resctrl_arch_is_evt_configurable() uses rdt_cpu_has() from
> resctrl_mon_resource_init(), which isn't marked __init. In addition,
"which isn't marked __init" ... this is no longer accurate, which seems
to indicate that this argument is artifact of this series.
Reinette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists