lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dd2cf042-f354-4512-9326-cfe5dd29dd9d@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 12:37:14 +0530
From: MD Danish Anwar <danishanwar@...com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
CC: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>, Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>,
        Sai Krishna
	<saikrishnag@...vell.com>,
        Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
        Dan Carpenter
	<dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
        Diogo Ivo <diogo.ivo@...mens.com>,
        Heiner
 Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>,
        Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Paolo Abeni
	<pabeni@...hat.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        "David S. Miller"
	<davem@...emloft.net>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof
 Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Santosh
 Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Tero
 Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>,
        <srk@...com>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
	<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] dt-bindings: soc: ti: pruss: Add documentation for
 PA_STATS support



On 13/08/24 5:52 am, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 11:20:56 +0530 MD Danish Anwar wrote:
>>> If the net maintainers are OK, they could potentially take the binding
>>> patch along with the driver mods corresponding to this - I am a bit
>>> unsure of picking up a binding if the driver implementation is heading
>>> the wrong way.   
>>
>> Hi Jakub, Paolo, David, Andrew,
>>
>> Will it be okay to pick this binding patch to net-next tree. Nishant is
>> suggesting since the driver changes are done in drivers/net/ the binding
>> can be picked by net maintainers.
>>
>> Please let us know if it will be okay to take this binding to net-next.
>> I can post a new series with just the binding and the driver patch to
>> net-next if needed.
> 
> Nishanth, could you send an official Ack tag?
> 
> No problem with merging it via net-next.
> On the code itself you may want to use ethtool_puts().

Thanks Jakub, I will send out a new series with just the binding and
driver patch and send it to net-next. I will take care of ethtool_puts().

-- 
Thanks and Regards,
Danish

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ