linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] net/mlx5: Use cpumask_local

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3dcbfb0d-6e54-4450-a266-bf4701e77e08@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 10:48:40 +0300
From: Tariq Toukan <ttoukan.linux@...il.com>
To: Erwan Velu <erwanaliasr1@...il.com>, Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
Cc: Erwan Velu <e.velu@...teo.com>, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
 Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
 "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/mlx5: Use cpumask_local_spread() instead of custom
 code



On 12/08/2024 11:22, Erwan Velu wrote:
> Commit 2acda57736de ("net/mlx5e: Improve remote NUMA preferences used for the IRQ affinity hints")
> removed the usage of cpumask_local_spread().
> 
> The issue explained in this commit was fixed by
> commit 406d394abfcd ("cpumask: improve on cpumask_local_spread() locality").
> 
> Since this commit, mlx5_cpumask_default_spread() is having the same
> behavior as cpumask_local_spread().
> 

Adding Yuri.

One patch led to the other, finally they were all submitted within the 
same patchset.

cpumask_local_spread() indeed improved, and AFAIU is functionally 
equivalent to existing logic.
According to [1] the current code is faster.
However, this alone is not a relevant enough argument, as we're talking 
about slowpath here.

Yuri, is that accurate? Is this the only difference?

If so, I am fine with this change, preferring simplicity.

[1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.11-rc3/source/lib/cpumask.c#L122

> This commit is about :
> - removing the specific logic and use cpumask_local_spread() instead
> - passing mlx5_core_dev as argument to more flexibility
> 
> mlx5_cpumask_default_spread() is kept as it could be useful for some
> future specific quirks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Erwan Velu <e.velu@...teo.com>
> ---
>   drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eq.c | 27 +++-----------------
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eq.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eq.c
> index cb7e7e4104af..f15ecaef1331 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eq.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eq.c
> @@ -835,28 +835,9 @@ static void comp_irq_release_pci(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, u16 vecidx)
>   	mlx5_irq_release_vector(irq);
>   }
>   
> -static int mlx5_cpumask_default_spread(int numa_node, int index)
> +static int mlx5_cpumask_default_spread(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, int index)
>   {
> -	const struct cpumask *prev = cpu_none_mask;
> -	const struct cpumask *mask;
> -	int found_cpu = 0;
> -	int i = 0;
> -	int cpu;
> -
> -	rcu_read_lock();
> -	for_each_numa_hop_mask(mask, numa_node) {
> -		for_each_cpu_andnot(cpu, mask, prev) {
> -			if (i++ == index) {
> -				found_cpu = cpu;
> -				goto spread_done;
> -			}
> -		}
> -		prev = mask;
> -	}
> -
> -spread_done:
> -	rcu_read_unlock();
> -	return found_cpu;
> +	return cpumask_local_spread(index, dev->priv.numa_node);
>   }
>   
>   static struct cpu_rmap *mlx5_eq_table_get_pci_rmap(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
> @@ -880,7 +861,7 @@ static int comp_irq_request_pci(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, u16 vecidx)
>   	int cpu;
>   
>   	rmap = mlx5_eq_table_get_pci_rmap(dev);
> -	cpu = mlx5_cpumask_default_spread(dev->priv.numa_node, vecidx);
> +	cpu = mlx5_cpumask_default_spread(dev, vecidx);
>   	irq = mlx5_irq_request_vector(dev, cpu, vecidx, &rmap);
>   	if (IS_ERR(irq))
>   		return PTR_ERR(irq);
> @@ -1145,7 +1126,7 @@ int mlx5_comp_vector_get_cpu(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, int vector)
>   	if (mask)
>   		cpu = cpumask_first(mask);
>   	else
> -		cpu = mlx5_cpumask_default_spread(dev->priv.numa_node, vector);
> +		cpu = mlx5_cpumask_default_spread(dev, vector);
>   
>   	return cpu;
>   }