[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <180f7459-39fa-4e96-83d6-504e7802dc94@broadcom.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 12:59:51 +0200
From: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, Jacobe Zang <jacobe.zang@...ion.com>,
robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, heiko@...ech.de, kvalo@...nel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, conor+dt@...nel.org
Cc: efectn@...tonmail.com, dsimic@...jaro.org, jagan@...eble.ai,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
arend@...adcom.com, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
megi@....cz, duoming@....edu.cn, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
minipli@...ecurity.net, brcm80211@...ts.linux.dev,
brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@...adcom.com, nick@...das.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/5] dt-bindings: net: wireless: brcm4329-fmac: add
pci14e4,449d
On 8/14/2024 12:39 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 14/08/2024 12:08, Arend van Spriel wrote:
>> On 8/14/2024 10:53 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 13/08/2024 19:04, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
>>>> On August 13, 2024 10:20:24 AM Jacobe Zang <jacobe.zang@...ion.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> It's the device id used by AP6275P which is the Wi-Fi module
>>>>> used by Rockchip's RK3588 evaluation board and also used in
>>>>> some other RK3588 boards.
>>>>
>>>> Hi Kalle,
>>>>
>>>> There probably will be a v11, but wanted to know how this series will be
>>>> handled as it involves device tree bindings, arm arch device tree spec, and
>>>> brcmfmac driver code. Can it all go through wireless-next?
>>>
>>> No, DTS must not go via wireless-next. Please split it from the series
>>> and provide lore link in changelog for bindings.
>>
>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>
>> Is it really important how the patches travel upstream to Linus. This
>> binding is specific to Broadcom wifi devices so there are no
>> dependencies(?). To clarify what you are asking I assume two separate
>> series:
>>
>> 1) DT binding + Khadas Edge2 DTS -> devicetree@...r.kernel.org
>> reference to:
>> https://patch.msgid.link/20240813082007.2625841-1-jacobe.zang@wesion.com
>>
>> 2) brcmfmac driver changes -> linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
>
> No. I said only DTS is separate. This was always the rule, since forever.
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst
I am going slightly mad (by Queen). That documents says:
1) The Documentation/ and include/dt-bindings/ portion of the patch
should
be a separate patch.
and
4) Submit the entire series to the devicetree mailinglist at
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Above I mentioned "series", not "patch". So 1) is a series of 3 patches
(2 changes to the DT binding file and 1 patch for the Khadas Edge2 DTS.
Is that correct?
Regards,
Arend
Powered by blists - more mailing lists