[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240814-banknoten-podium-752bc822ac71@brauner>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 14:43:03 +0200
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
To: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
jack@...e.cz,
jlayton@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfs: drop one lock trip in evict()
On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 16:36:26 +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> Most commonly neither I_LRU_ISOLATING nor I_SYNC are set, but the stock
> kernel takes a back-to-back relock trip to check for them.
>
> It probably can be avoided altogether, but for now massage things back
> to just one lock acquire.
>
>
> [...]
Applied to the vfs.fixes branch of the vfs/vfs.git tree.
Patches in the vfs.fixes branch should appear in linux-next soon.
Please report any outstanding bugs that were missed during review in a
new review to the original patch series allowing us to drop it.
It's encouraged to provide Acked-bys and Reviewed-bys even though the
patch has now been applied. If possible patch trailers will be updated.
Note that commit hashes shown below are subject to change due to rebase,
trailer updates or similar. If in doubt, please check the listed branch.
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vfs/vfs.git
branch: vfs.fixes
[1/1] vfs: drop one lock trip in evict()
https://git.kernel.org/vfs/vfs/c/8b30d568bd8d
Powered by blists - more mailing lists