linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 10/19] KVM: Use follow

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240814131514.GJ2032816@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 10:15:14 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, x86@...nel.org,
	Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
	Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/19] KVM: Use follow_pfnmap API

On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 04:44:40PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:

> > > > I don't think it has to be done in this series, but a future
> > > > optimization to consider is having follow_pfnmap just tell the caller
> > > > about the mapping level directly. It already found this information as
> > > > part of its walk. I think there's a possibility to simplify KVM /
> > > > avoid it having to do its own walk again later.
> > >
> > > AFAIU pfnmap isn't special in this case, as we do the "walk pgtable twice"
> > > idea also to a generic page here, so probably not directly relevant to this
> > > patch alone.
> 
> Ya.  My original hope was that KVM could simply walk the host page tables and get
> whatever PFN+size it found, i.e. that KVM wouldn't care about pfn-mapped versus
> regular pages.  That might be feasible after dropping all of KVM's refcounting
> shenanigans[*]?  Not sure, haven't thought too much about it, precisely because
> I too think it won't provide any meaningful performance boost.

The main thing, from my perspective, is that KVM reliably creates 1G
mappings in its table if the VMA has 1G mappings, across all arches
and scenarios. For normal memory and PFNMAP equally.

Not returning the size here makes me wonder if that actually happens?
Does KVM have another way to know what size entry to create?

Jason