linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the drm-xe tree with the drm-intel tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240815113717.1c81c44c@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 11:37:17 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>, Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com>, Daniel Vetter
 <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>, Joonas
 Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>, Rodrigo Vivi
 <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>
Cc: Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>, DRI
 <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, DRM XE List
 <intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List
 <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-xe tree with the drm-intel tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the drm-xe tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c

between commit:

  769b081c18b9 ("drm/i915/opregion: convert to struct intel_display")

from the drm-intel tree and commit:

  1eda95cba9df ("drm/xe: Rename enable_display module param")

from the drm-xe tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
index 0e4adde84cb2,56a940b39412..000000000000
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
@@@ -127,9 -126,8 +127,9 @@@ int xe_display_init_nommio(struct xe_de
  static void xe_display_fini_noirq(void *arg)
  {
  	struct xe_device *xe = arg;
 +	struct intel_display *display = &xe->display;
  
- 	if (!xe->info.enable_display)
+ 	if (!xe->info.probe_display)
  		return;
  
  	intel_display_driver_remove_noirq(xe);
@@@ -138,10 -135,9 +138,10 @@@
  
  int xe_display_init_noirq(struct xe_device *xe)
  {
 +	struct intel_display *display = &xe->display;
  	int err;
  
- 	if (!xe->info.enable_display)
+ 	if (!xe->info.probe_display)
  		return 0;
  
  	intel_display_driver_early_probe(xe);
@@@ -252,9 -246,7 +252,9 @@@ void xe_display_irq_handler(struct xe_d
  
  void xe_display_irq_enable(struct xe_device *xe, u32 gu_misc_iir)
  {
 +	struct intel_display *display = &xe->display;
 +
- 	if (!xe->info.enable_display)
+ 	if (!xe->info.probe_display)
  		return;
  
  	if (gu_misc_iir & GU_MISC_GSE)
@@@ -289,9 -296,8 +289,9 @@@ static bool suspend_to_idle(void
  
  void xe_display_pm_suspend(struct xe_device *xe, bool runtime)
  {
 +	struct intel_display *display = &xe->display;
  	bool s2idle = suspend_to_idle();
- 	if (!xe->info.enable_display)
+ 	if (!xe->info.probe_display)
  		return;
  
  	/*
@@@ -341,9 -347,7 +341,9 @@@ void xe_display_pm_resume_early(struct 
  
  void xe_display_pm_resume(struct xe_device *xe, bool runtime)
  {
 +	struct intel_display *display = &xe->display;
 +
- 	if (!xe->info.enable_display)
+ 	if (!xe->info.probe_display)
  		return;
  
  	intel_dmc_resume(xe);

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped