linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] mremap refactor: check src address for vma boundaries first.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <nu4c2nh5jsm6ldb2xvyw5ilgvekalq5lsfrxjw6xsx7txrwygt@r63xfvdt7cjk>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 16:14:33 -0400
From: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>
To: Jeff Xu <jeffxu@...gle.com>
Cc: Jeff Xu <jeffxu@...omium.org>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        willy@...radead.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        pedro.falcato@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com,
        mpe@...erman.id.au, oliver.sang@...el.com, vbabka@...e.cz,
        keescook@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] mremap refactor: check src address for vma
 boundaries first.

* Jeff Xu <jeffxu@...gle.com> [240815 13:23]:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 9:50 AM Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com> wrote:
> >
> > * Jeff Xu <jeffxu@...omium.org> [240814 23:46]:
> > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 12:55 PM Liam R. Howlett
> > > <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com> wrote:
> > > > The majority of the comments to V2 are mine, you only told us that
> > > > splitting a sealed vma is wrong (after I asked you directly to answer)
> > > > and then you made a comment about testing of the patch set. Besides the
> > > > direct responses to me, your comment was "wait for me to test".
> > > >
> > > Please share this link for  " Besides the direct responses to me, your
> > > comment was "wait for me to test".
> > > Or  pop up that email by responding to it, to remind me.  Thanks.
> >
> > [1].
> 
> That is responding to Andrew, to indicate V2 patch has dependency on
> arch_munmap in PPC. And I will review/test the code, I will respond to
> Andrew directly.
> 
> PS Your statement above is entirely false, and out of context.
> 
> " You only told us that splitting a sealed vma is wrong (after I asked
> you directly to answer) and then you made a comment about testing of
> the patch set. Besides the direct responses to me, your comment was
> "wait for me to test".

[1] has your "wait for me to test" to hold up a patch set, [2] has you
answering my direct question to you and making the untested comment to
someone else.

So, entirely true.

Liam

[1]. https://lore.kernel.org/all/CALmYWFs0v07z5vheDt1h3hD+3--yr6Va0ZuQeaATo+-8MuRJ-g@mail.gmail.com/
[2]. https://lore.kernel.org/all/CALmYWFvURJBgyFw7x5qrL4CqoZjy92NeFAS750XaLxO7o7Cv9A@mail.gmail.com/