lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7f47361f-caf8-45f2-9aaf-4a2a49eb525b@linux.dev>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 19:20:31 -0700
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>
To: Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)
 <alexis.lothore@...tlin.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
 Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
 Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
 Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>,
 John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
 Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
 Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@...com>,
 Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, ebpf@...uxfoundation.org,
 Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 4/4] selftests/bpf: convert
 test_skb_cgroup_id_user to test_progs

On 8/13/24 5:45 AM, Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation) wrote:

> +#define DST_ADDR "ff02::1"

[ ... ]

> +static int wait_local_ip(void)
> +{
> +	char *ping_cmd = ping_command(AF_INET6);
> +	int i, err;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < WAIT_AUTO_IP_MAX_ATTEMPT; i++) {
> +		err = SYS_NOFAIL("%s -c 1 -W 1 %s%%%s", ping_cmd, DST_ADDR,
> +				 VETH_1);

I tried in my qemu. This loop takes at least 3-4 iteration to get the ping 
through. This test could become flaky if the CI is busy.

I have been always wondering why some of the (non) test_progs has this practice.
I traced a little. I think it has something to do with the "ff02::1" used in the 
test and/or the local link address is not ready. I have not further nailed it 
down but I think it is close enough.

It will be easier to use a nodad configured v6 addr.

I take this chance to use an easier "::1" address for the test here instead of 
ff02::1. This also removed the need to add veth pair and no need to ping first.

Applied with the "::1" changes mentioned above.

Thanks for migrating the tests to test_progs. This is long overdue.




> +		if (!err)
> +			break;
> +	}
> +
> +	return err;
> +}
> +

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ