linux-kernel - [PATCH RESEND] Avoid schedule while atomic if meeting the early deadlock.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID:
 <ME0P300MB063599BEF0743B8FA339C2CECC802@ME0P300MB0635.AUSP300.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 10:58:13 +0800
From: Roland Xu <mu001999@...look.com>
To: peterz@...radead.org,
	mingo@...hat.com,
	will@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Roland Xu <mu001999@...look.com>
Subject: [PATCH RESEND] Avoid schedule while atomic if meeting the early deadlock.

The wait_lock is held in rt_mutex_handle_deadlock,
so unlock_irq it if rtmutex deadlock is detected.
Otherwise, this would trigger scheduling while atomic.

Signed-off-by: Roland Xu <mu001999@...look.com>
---
 kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
index 88d08eeb8bc0..9188bfb63cb6 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
@@ -1644,6 +1644,7 @@ static int __sched rt_mutex_slowlock_block(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
 }
 
 static void __sched rt_mutex_handle_deadlock(int res, int detect_deadlock,
+					     struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
 					     struct rt_mutex_waiter *w)
 {
 	/*
@@ -1660,6 +1661,7 @@ static void __sched rt_mutex_handle_deadlock(int res, int detect_deadlock,
 	 * Yell loudly and stop the task right here.
 	 */
 	WARN(1, "rtmutex deadlock detected\n");
+	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&lock->wait_lock);
 	while (1) {
 		set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
 		rt_mutex_schedule();
@@ -1713,7 +1715,7 @@ static int __sched __rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
 	} else {
 		__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
 		remove_waiter(lock, waiter);
-		rt_mutex_handle_deadlock(ret, chwalk, waiter);
+		rt_mutex_handle_deadlock(ret, chwalk, lock, waiter);
 	}
 
 	/*
-- 
2.34.1