[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5057223.82XvGhxQ46@diego>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 15:49:12 +0200
From: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Detlev Casanova <detlev.casanova@...labora.com>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, kernel@...labora.com,
Detlev Casanova <detlev.casanova@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: mmc: Add support for rk3576 dw-mshc
Am Donnerstag, 15. August 2024, 00:34:00 CEST schrieb Detlev Casanova:
> Add the compatible string for rockchip,rk3576-dw-mshc and add support
> for the rockchip,v2-tuning flag, a new feature of this core.
>
> Signed-off-by: Detlev Casanova <detlev.casanova@...labora.com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/rockchip-dw-mshc.yaml | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/rockchip-dw-mshc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/rockchip-dw-mshc.yaml
> index 211cd0b0bc5f3..0543cdb51c657 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/rockchip-dw-mshc.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/rockchip-dw-mshc.yaml
> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ properties:
> - rockchip,rk3368-dw-mshc
> - rockchip,rk3399-dw-mshc
> - rockchip,rk3568-dw-mshc
> + - rockchip,rk3576-dw-mshc
> - rockchip,rk3588-dw-mshc
> - rockchip,rv1108-dw-mshc
> - rockchip,rv1126-dw-mshc
this would mark the rk3576-dw-mshc as being the "same" as the
core rk3288 variant. rk3288 was the first controller introducing the
clock tuning for higher speeds. with the clocks being part of the CRU.
As we can see in later patches, this rk3576 though changes that
setup with moving the tunable clock configurations into the controller
itself.
So please don't claim to be compatible to the 3288, but instead start
a new block for this new set of controllers:
compatible:
oneOf:
# for Rockchip RK2928 and before RK3288
- const: rockchip,rk2928-dw-mshc
# for Rockchip RK3288
- const: rockchip,rk3288-dw-mshc
- items:
- enum:
- rockchip,px30-dw-mshc
- rockchip,rk1808-dw-mshc
- rockchip,rk3036-dw-mshc
- rockchip,rk3128-dw-mshc
- rockchip,rk3228-dw-mshc
- rockchip,rk3308-dw-mshc
- rockchip,rk3328-dw-mshc
- rockchip,rk3368-dw-mshc
- rockchip,rk3399-dw-mshc
- rockchip,rk3568-dw-mshc
- rockchip,rk3588-dw-mshc
- rockchip,rv1108-dw-mshc
- rockchip,rv1126-dw-mshc
- const: rockchip,rk3288-dw-mshc
+ # for Rockchip RK3576 with phase tuning inside the controller
+ - const: rockchip,rk3576-dw-mshc
That way you can simplify the dt-parsing code too.
Heiko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists