lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <172372994551.42484.5241249306313134145.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 14:52:25 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, 
 Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, 
 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, 
 "yr.yang" <yr.yang@...iatek.com>
Cc: linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, 
 Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: mediatek: mt8188: Mark AFE_DAC_CON0 register
 as volatile

On Thu, 01 Aug 2024 16:43:26 +0800, yr.yang wrote:
> Add AFE Control Register 0 to the volatile_register.
> AFE_DAC_CON0 can be modified by both the SOF and ALSA drivers.
> If this register is read and written in cache mode, the cached value
> might not reflect the actual value when the register is modified by
> another driver. It can cause playback or capture failures. Therefore,
> it is necessary to add AFE_DAC_CON0 to the list of volatile registers.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: mediatek: mt8188: Mark AFE_DAC_CON0 register as volatile
      commit: ff9f065318e17a1a97981d9e535fcfc6ce5d5614

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ