[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87msldyj97.fsf@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 17:04:52 +0300
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Jeff Johnson <jjohnson@...nel.org>, Johannes Berg
<johannes@...solutions.net>, Ath10k List <ath10k@...ts.infradead.org>,
Aditya Kumar Singh <quic_adisi@...cinc.com>, Baochen Qiang
<quic_bqiang@...cinc.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List
<linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, Wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ath-next tree with the ath tree
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> writes:
> Hi all,
>
> On Thu, 8 Aug 2024 10:43:48 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the ath-next tree got a conflict in:
>>
>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/hw.c
>>
>> between commit:
>>
>> 38055789d151 ("wifi: ath12k: use 128 bytes aligned iova in transmit path for WCN7850")
>>
>> from the ath tree and commit:
>>
>> 8be12629b428 ("wifi: ath12k: restore ASPM for supported hardwares only")
>>
>> from the ath-next tree.
>>
>> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
>> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
>> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
>> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
>> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
>> complex conflicts.
>>
>> diff --cc drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/hw.c
>> index 7b0b6a7f4701,76c0e07a88de..000000000000
>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/hw.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/hw.c
>> @@@ -925,7 -925,7 +925,9 @@@ static const struct ath12k_hw_params at
>> .acpi_guid = NULL,
>> .supports_dynamic_smps_6ghz = true,
>>
>> + .iova_mask = 0,
>> ++
>> + .supports_aspm = false,
>> },
>> {
>> .name = "wcn7850 hw2.0",
>> @@@ -1003,7 -1003,7 +1005,9 @@@
>> .acpi_guid = &wcn7850_uuid,
>> .supports_dynamic_smps_6ghz = false,
>>
>> + .iova_mask = ATH12K_PCIE_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE - 1,
>> ++
>> + .supports_aspm = true,
>> },
>> {
>> .name = "qcn9274 hw2.0",
>> @@@ -1077,7 -1077,7 +1081,9 @@@
>> .acpi_guid = NULL,
>> .supports_dynamic_smps_6ghz = true,
>>
>> + .iova_mask = 0,
>> ++
>> + .supports_aspm = false,
>> },
>> };
>>
>
> This is now a conflict between the wireless-next tree and the ath tree.
Thanks. The plan is that the network maintainers will fix this once the
commits "meet" in net-next. We are trying to avoid unnessary merges.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
Powered by blists - more mailing lists