linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] Fix Allwinner D1 boot regression

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7902c26a-d719-45ad-85d5-61ce6bbc9459@sifive.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 10:03:10 -0500
From: Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@...ive.com>
To: Anup Patel <apatel@...tanamicro.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
 Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@...onical.com>,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
 Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Palmer Dabbelt
 <palmer@...belt.com>, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
 Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] Fix Allwinner D1 boot regression

Hi Anup,

On 2024-08-15 9:30 AM, Anup Patel wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 7:02 PM Samuel Holland
> <samuel.holland@...ive.com> wrote:
>>> Yes. So the riscv timer is not working on this thing or it stops
>>> somehow.
>>
>> That's correct. With the (firmware) devicetree that Emil is using, the OpenSBI
>> firmware does not have a timer device, so it does not expose the (optional[1])
>> SBI time extension, and sbi_set_timer() does nothing.
> 
> OpenSBI uses platform specific M-mode timer (mtime and mtimecmp) to
> provide SBI time extension to Linux.
> 
> The RISC-V privileged specification (v1.10 or higher) requires platform to
> provide a M-mode timer (mtime and mtimecmp).
> 
> This platform not having any M-mode timer is yet another RISC-V spec
> violation by this platform.

You've misunderstood here. Allwinner D1 (T-HEAD C906) _does_ have an M-mode
timer (a CLINT). It is just omitted from devicetree that Emil happens to be
using, so OpenSBI isn't using it.

Currently OpenSBI allows the system to boot without a timer device, and the SBI
specification does not mandate the time extension. If consensus is that either
of these should change, that's fine, but currently I see nothing in either the
privileged spec nor the SBI spec that guarantees the availability of some timer
to the kernel in S-mode.

Regards,
Samuel