[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240815151744.GL632411@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 16:17:44 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...ux.dev>
Cc: Radhey Shyam Pandey <radhey.shyam.pandey@....com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Ariane Keller <ariane.keller@....ee.ethz.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/4] net: xilinx: axienet: Always disable
promiscuous mode
On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 11:14:41AM -0400, Sean Anderson wrote:
> On 8/15/24 10:58, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 04:04:34PM -0400, Sean Anderson wrote:
> >> If prmiscuous mode is disabled when there are fewer than four multicast
> >> addresses, then it will to be reflected in the hardware. Fix this by
> >> always clearing the promiscuous mode flag even when we program multicast
> >> addresses.
> >>
> >> Fixes: 8a3b7a252dca ("drivers/net/ethernet/xilinx: added Xilinx AXI Ethernet driver")
> >> Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...ux.dev>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> drivers/net/ethernet/xilinx/xilinx_axienet_main.c | 4 ++++
> >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/xilinx/xilinx_axienet_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/xilinx/xilinx_axienet_main.c
> >> index ca04c298daa2..e664611c29cf 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/xilinx/xilinx_axienet_main.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/xilinx/xilinx_axienet_main.c
> >> @@ -451,6 +451,10 @@ static void axienet_set_multicast_list(struct net_device *ndev)
> >> } else if (!netdev_mc_empty(ndev)) {
> >> struct netdev_hw_addr *ha;
> >>
> >> + reg = axienet_ior(lp, XAE_FMI_OFFSET);
> >> + reg &= ~XAE_FMI_PM_MASK;
> >> + axienet_iow(lp, XAE_FMI_OFFSET, reg);
> >> +
> >
> > Hi Sean,
> >
> > I notice that this replicates code in another part of this function.
> > And that is then factored out into common code as part of the last
> > patch of this series.
> >
> > I guess that it is in the wash, but perhaps it would
> > be nicer to factor out the common promisc mode setting code
> > as part of this patch.
> >
> > Otherwise, this LGTM.
>
> I thought about doing that, but it would have required changing the
> indentation of ~10 lines and I thought it would be easier to review
> the patch without that noise.
Sure, I was also wrestling with that in my mind.
I think we can stick with what you have :)
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists