lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4927264.xgNZFEDtJV@diego>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 18:12:48 +0200
From: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
 Dragan Simic <dsimic@...jaro.org>
Cc: vkoul@...nel.org, kishon@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject:
 Re: [PATCH] phy: phy-rockchip-inno-usb2: Handle failed extcon allocation
 better

Am Dienstag, 13. August 2024, 20:38:17 CEST schrieb Dragan Simic:
> Return the actual error code upon failure to allocate extcon device, instead
> of hardcoding -ENOMEM.  While there, produce an appropriate error message.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dragan Simic <dsimic@...jaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-inno-usb2.c | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-inno-usb2.c b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-inno-usb2.c
> index 4f71373ae6e1..d33418a1e7a8 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-inno-usb2.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-inno-usb2.c
> @@ -434,8 +434,10 @@ static int rockchip_usb2phy_extcon_register(struct rockchip_usb2phy *rphy)
>  		edev = devm_extcon_dev_allocate(rphy->dev,
>  						rockchip_usb2phy_extcon_cable);
>  
> -		if (IS_ERR(edev))
> -			return -ENOMEM;
> +		if (IS_ERR(edev)) {
> +			dev_err(rphy->dev, "failed to allocate extcon device\n");
> +			return PTR_ERR(edev);
> +		}

maybe even use dev_err_probe?

rockchip_usb2phy_extcon_register() gets called from the probe function,
so even using it is also sematically correct ;-) .


Heiko

>  
>  		ret = devm_extcon_dev_register(rphy->dev, edev);
>  		if (ret) {
> 





Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ