[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<CH0PR18MB4339720BC03E2E4E6FAC0251CD812@CH0PR18MB4339.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 13:36:41 +0000
From: Geethasowjanya Akula <gakula@...vell.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net"
<davem@...emloft.net>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Sunil Kovvuri Goutham
<sgoutham@...vell.com>,
Subbaraya Sundeep Bhatta <sbhatta@...vell.com>,
Hariprasad Kelam <hkelam@...vell.com>
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: [net-next PATCH v10 01/11] octeontx2-pf:
Refactoring RVU driver
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
>Sent: Thursday, August 8, 2024 9:12 PM
>To: Geethasowjanya Akula <gakula@...vell.com>
>Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; kuba@...nel.org;
>davem@...emloft.net; pabeni@...hat.com; edumazet@...gle.com; Sunil
>Kovvuri Goutham <sgoutham@...vell.com>; Subbaraya Sundeep Bhatta
><sbhatta@...vell.com>; Hariprasad Kelam <hkelam@...vell.com>
>Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [net-next PATCH v10 01/11] octeontx2-pf: Refactoring
>RVU driver
>
>Mon, Aug 05, 2024 at 03:18:05PM CEST, gakula@...vell.com wrote:
>>Refactoring and export list of shared functions such that they can be
>>used by both RVU NIC and representor driver.
>>
>>Signed-off-by: Geetha sowjanya <gakula@...vell.com>
>>Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
>>---
>> .../ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/common.h | 2 +
>> .../net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/mbox.h | 2 +
>> .../net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/npc.h | 1 +
>> .../net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu.c | 11 +
>> .../net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu.h | 1 +
>> .../marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_debugfs.c | 27 --
>> .../ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_nix.c | 47 ++--
>> .../marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_npc_fs.c | 5 +
>> .../ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_reg.h | 4 +
>> .../marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_struct.h | 26 ++
>> .../marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_switch.c | 2 +-
>> .../marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_common.c | 6 +-
>> .../marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_common.h | 43 ++--
>> .../ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_pf.c | 240 +++++++++++-------
>> .../marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_txrx.c | 17 +-
>> .../marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_txrx.h | 3 +-
>> .../ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_vf.c | 7 +-
>> 17 files changed, 266 insertions(+), 178 deletions(-)
>
>How can anyone review this?
>
>If you need to refactor the code in preparation for a feature, you can do in in a
>separate patchset sent before the feature appears. This patch should be split
>into X patches. One logical change per patch.
If these changes are moved into a separate patchset. How can someone understand and review
them without knowing where they get reused.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists