[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240816-licorice-dealing-b67197d3f88f@spud>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 17:04:34 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Stanislav Jakubek <stano.jakubek@...il.com>
Cc: Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: power: supply: sc27xx-fg: add low voltage
alarm IRQ
On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 08:58:43AM +0200, Stanislav Jakubek wrote:
> Hi Conor,
>
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 03:46:18PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 12:01:36PM +0200, Stanislav Jakubek wrote:
> > > The SC27XX fuel gauge supports a low voltage alarm IRQ, which is used
> > > for more accurate battery capacity measurements with lower voltages.
> > >
> > > This was unfortunately never documented in bindings, do so now.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Jakubek <stano.jakubek@...il.com>
> > > ---
> > > Initial Linux driver submission adding this feature:
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ee1dd39f126bd03fb88381de9663d32df994d341.1542185618.git.baolin.wang@linaro.org/
> > >
> > > The only in-tree user (sc2731.dtsi) has had interrupts specified since its
> > > initial fuel-gauge submission:
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/4f66af3b47ba241380f8092e08879aca6d7c35b3.1548052878.git.baolin.wang@linaro.org/
> >
> > This context could go into the commit message I think, as justification
> > for making the interrupt required.
>
> TBH I'm not 100% sure that the interrupt is required, I just looked at
> the Linux driver, and that it returns from probe if it doesn't get the IRQ.
>
> >
> > Also, this binding is odd in that it has several compatibles in an enum,
> > but the driver (added at the same time) only has one compatible in it.
>
> I think the intent was to document the entire sc27xx series of PMICs, as
> they're supposedly very similar (this is just my guess), while initially
> adding support only for sc2731.
>
> > Are you using the sc2731 in your device?
>
> No, I do not have any such device.
No worries.
Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists