[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <871q2o5lyl.fsf@cloudflare.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 21:03:46 +0200
From: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
To: Michal Luczaj <mhal@...x.co>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>
Cc: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>, Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@...com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann
<daniel@...earbox.net>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Yonghong Song
<yonghong.song@...ux.dev>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, KP
Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>, Hao
Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Shuah Khan
<shuah@...nel.org>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/6] selftests/bpf: Various sockmap-related
fixes
On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 06:14 PM +02, Michal Luczaj wrote:
> On 8/6/24 19:45, Jakub Sitnicki wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 07:18 PM +02, Michal Luczaj wrote:
>>> Great, thanks for the review. With this completed, I guess we can unwind
>>> the (mail) stack to [1]. Is that ingress-to-local et al. something you
>>> wanted to take care of yourself or can I give it a try?
>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/87msmqn9ws.fsf@cloudflare.com/
>>
>> I haven't stated any work on. You're welcome to tackle that.
>>
>> All I have is a toy test that I've used to generate the redirect matrix.
>> Perhaps it can serve as inspiration:
>>
>> https://github.com/jsitnicki/sockmap-redir-matrix
>
> All right, please let me know if this is more or less what you meant and
> I'll post the whole series for a review (+patch to purge sockmap_listen of
> redir tests, fix misnomers). Mostly I've just copypasted your code
> (mangling it terribly along the way), so I feel silly claiming the
> authorship. Should I assign you as an author?
Don't worry about it. I appreciate the help.
I will take a look at the redirect tests this weekend.
> Note that the patches are based on [2], which has not reached bpf-next
> (patchwork says: "Needs ACK").
>
> [2] [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/6] selftests/bpf: Various sockmap-related fixes
> https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240731-selftest-sockmap-fixes-v2-0-08a0c73abed2@rbox.co/
Might have slipped throught the cracks...
Andrii, Martin,
The patch set still applies cleanly to bpf-next.
Would you be able to a look at this series? Anything we need to do?
Thanks,
(the other) Jakub
Powered by blists - more mailing lists