[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4bac083a-1d51-41c3-992f-c09235db8a73@amd.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 15:39:41 -0500
From: "Moger, Babu" <babu.moger@....com>
To: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, paulmck@...nel.org, rdunlap@...radead.org,
tj@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, yanjiewtw@...il.com,
kim.phillips@....com, lukas.bulwahn@...il.com, seanjc@...gle.com,
jmattson@...gle.com, leitao@...ian.org, jpoimboe@...nel.org,
rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com,
jithu.joseph@...el.com, kai.huang@...el.com, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com,
daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com, pbonzini@...hat.com, sandipan.das@....com,
ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com, peternewman@...gle.com,
maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, eranian@...gle.com,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
bp@...en8.de, corbet@....net, fenghua.yu@...el.com, reinette.chatre@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 15/22] x86/resctrl: Add the interface to assign a
hardware counter
Hi James,
On 8/16/24 11:30, James Morse wrote:
> Hi Babu,
>
> On 06/08/2024 23:00, Babu Moger wrote:
>> The ABMC feature provides an option to the user to assign a hardware
>> counter to an RMID and monitor the bandwidth as long as it is assigned.
>> The assigned RMID will be tracked by the hardware until the user unassigns
>> it manually.
>>
>> Counters are configured by writing to L3_QOS_ABMC_CFG MSR and
>> specifying the counter id, bandwidth source, and bandwidth types.
>>
>> Provide the interface to assign the counter ids to RMID.
>>
>> The feature details are documented in the APM listed below [1].
>> [1] AMD64 Architecture Programmer's Manual Volume 2: System Programming
>> Publication # 24593 Revision 3.41 section 19.3.3.3 Assignable Bandwidth
>> Monitoring (ABMC).
>
>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
>> index 60696b248b56..1ee91a7293a8 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
>> @@ -1864,6 +1864,103 @@ static ssize_t mbm_local_bytes_config_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
>
>> +/*
>> + * Send an IPI to the domain to assign the counter id to RMID.
>> + */
>> +int resctrl_arch_assign_cntr(struct rdt_mon_domain *d, enum resctrl_event_id evtid,
>> + u32 rmid, u32 cntr_id, u32 closid, bool assign)
>
> MPAM ends up with a per-resource array of monitor-ids that it uses to map cntr_id
> allocated by resctrl to the underlying hardware id. Could this function pass the struct
> rdt_resource too?
> (this saves me having to assume its the L3 - adding to the technical debt in this area)
Yes. We can pass rdt_resource. It will be 7 parameters for this function.
Hope that is fine.
>
> Nit: could closid and rmid appear next to each other, and in that order ... just to fit
> with other helpers that take both.
Sure.
>
>
>> +{
>> + struct rdt_hw_mon_domain *hw_dom = resctrl_to_arch_mon_dom(d);
>> + union l3_qos_abmc_cfg abmc_cfg = { 0 };
>> + struct arch_mbm_state *arch_mbm;
>> +
>> + abmc_cfg.split.cfg_en = 1;
>> + abmc_cfg.split.cntr_en = assign ? 1 : 0;
>> + abmc_cfg.split.cntr_id = cntr_id;
>> + abmc_cfg.split.bw_src = rmid;
>> +
>> + /* Update the event configuration from the domain */
>> + if (evtid == QOS_L3_MBM_TOTAL_EVENT_ID) {
>> + abmc_cfg.split.bw_type = hw_dom->mbm_total_cfg;
>> + arch_mbm = &hw_dom->arch_mbm_total[rmid];
>> + } else {
>> + abmc_cfg.split.bw_type = hw_dom->mbm_local_cfg;
>> + arch_mbm = &hw_dom->arch_mbm_local[rmid];
>> + }
>> +
>> + smp_call_function_any(&d->hdr.cpu_mask, rdtgroup_abmc_cfg, &abmc_cfg, 1);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Reset the architectural state so that reading of hardware
>> + * counter is not considered as an overflow in next update.
>> + */
>> + if (arch_mbm)
>> + memset(arch_mbm, 0, sizeof(struct arch_mbm_state));
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> James
>
--
Thanks
Babu Moger
Powered by blists - more mailing lists