[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6c1305ae-caa3-4da1-a0c2-3948cac976be@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 14:34:04 -0700
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To: Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>, <corbet@....net>, <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
<tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <bp@...en8.de>,
<dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
CC: <x86@...nel.org>, <hpa@...or.com>, <paulmck@...nel.org>,
<rdunlap@...radead.org>, <tj@...nel.org>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
<yanjiewtw@...il.com>, <kim.phillips@....com>, <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>,
<seanjc@...gle.com>, <jmattson@...gle.com>, <leitao@...ian.org>,
<jpoimboe@...nel.org>, <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
<kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>, <jithu.joseph@...el.com>,
<kai.huang@...el.com>, <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
<daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com>, <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
<sandipan.das@....com>, <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
<peternewman@...gle.com>, <maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com>,
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<eranian@...gle.com>, <james.morse@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 08/22] x86/resctrl: Introduce interface to display
number of monitoring counters
Hi Babu,
On 8/6/24 3:00 PM, Babu Moger wrote:
> The ABMC feature provides an option to the user to assign a hardware
Here and in all patches, when referring to resctrl fs please use the more
generic "mbm_assign_cntr" mode to distinguish it from the hardware/architecture
specific code that involves ABMC. Something like
"The ABMC feature provides" -> ""mbm_cntr_assign" mode provides"
I also think that being explicit with this separation will help us to see
gaps in interface between resctrl fs and arch.
> counter to an RMID and monitor the bandwidth as long as the counter is
Please clarify the scope of this feature. Above mentions that a counter is
assigned to an RMID but later it is mentioned that the counter is assigned
to an event. Perhaps consistently mention that a counter is assigned to
a RMID,event pair?
> assigned. Number of assignments depend on number of monitoring counters
> available.
>
> Provide the interface to display the number of monitoring counters
> supported.
>
> Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>
> ---
> v6: No changes.
>
> v5: Changed the display name from num_cntrs to num_mbm_cntrs.
> Updated the commit message.
> Moved the patch after mbm_mode is introduced.
>
> v4: Changed the counter name to num_cntrs. And few text changes.
>
> v3: Changed the field name to mbm_assign_cntrs.
>
> v2: Changed the field name to mbm_assignable_counters from abmc_counte
> ---
> Documentation/arch/x86/resctrl.rst | 3 +++
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c | 2 ++
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/arch/x86/resctrl.rst b/Documentation/arch/x86/resctrl.rst
> index d4ec605b200a..fe9f10766c4f 100644
> --- a/Documentation/arch/x86/resctrl.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/arch/x86/resctrl.rst
> @@ -291,6 +291,9 @@ with the following files:
> as long as there are enough RMID counters available to support number
> of monitoring groups.
>
> +"num_mbm_cntrs":
> + The number of monitoring counters available for assignment.
> +
> "max_threshold_occupancy":
> Read/write file provides the largest value (in
> bytes) at which a previously used LLC_occupancy
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
> index 5e8706ab6361..83329cefebf7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
> @@ -1242,6 +1242,8 @@ int __init rdt_get_mon_l3_config(struct rdt_resource *r)
> r->mon.num_mbm_cntrs = (ebx & 0xFFFF) + 1;
> if (WARN_ON(r->mon.num_mbm_cntrs > 64))
> r->mon.num_mbm_cntrs = 64;
> +
> + resctrl_file_fflags_init("num_mbm_cntrs", RFTYPE_MON_INFO);
The arch code should not access the resctrl file flags. This should be moved to make
the MPAM support easier. With the arch code setting r->mon.mbm_cntr_assignable the
fs code can use that to set the flags. Something similar to below patch is needed:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240802172853.22529-27-james.morse@arm.com/
> }
> }
>
Reinette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists