[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240816045608.30564-6-neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 10:26:02 +0530
From: neeraj.upadhyay@...nel.org
To: rcu@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...a.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org,
paulmck@...nel.org,
neeraj.upadhyay@...nel.org,
neeraj.upadhyay@....com,
boqun.feng@...il.com,
joel@...lfernandes.org,
urezki@...il.com,
frederic@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH rcu 05/11] rcu/nocb: (De-)offload callbacks on offline CPUs only
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Currently callbacks can be (de-)offloaded only on online CPUs. This
involves an overly elaborated state machine in order to make sure that
callbacks are always handled during the process while ensuring
synchronization between rcu_core and NOCB kthreads.
The only potential user of NOCB (de-)offloading appears to be a
nohz_full toggling interface through cpusets. And the general agreement
is now to work toward toggling the nohz_full state on offline CPUs to
simplify the whole picture.
Therefore, convert the (de-)offloading to only support offline CPUs.
This involves the following changes:
* Call rcu_barrier() before deoffloading. An offline offloaded CPU may
still carry callbacks in its queue ignored by
rcutree_migrate_callbacks(). Those callbacks must all be flushed
before switching to a regular queue because no more kthreads will
handle those before the CPU ever gets re-onlined.
This means that further calls to rcu_barrier() will find an empty
queue until the CPU goes through rcutree_report_cpu_starting(). As a
result it is guaranteed that further rcu_barrier() won't try to lock
the nocb_lock for that target and thus won't risk an imbalance.
Therefore barrier_mutex doesn't need to be locked anymore upon
deoffloading.
* Assume the queue is empty before offloading, as
rcutree_migrate_callbacks() took care of everything.
This means that further calls to rcu_barrier() will find an empty
queue until the CPU goes through rcutree_report_cpu_starting(). As a
result it is guaranteed that further rcu_barrier() won't risk a
nocb_lock imbalance.
Therefore barrier_mutex doesn't need to be locked anymore upon
offloading.
* No need to flush bypass anymore.
Further simplifications will follow in upcoming patches.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@...nel.org>
---
kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h | 82 +++++++++++-------------------------------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
index 16bcb8b13a5e..8e766396df3a 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
@@ -1049,43 +1049,26 @@ static int rdp_offload_toggle(struct rcu_data *rdp,
return wake_gp;
}
-static long rcu_nocb_rdp_deoffload(void *arg)
+static int rcu_nocb_rdp_deoffload(struct rcu_data *rdp)
{
- struct rcu_data *rdp = arg;
struct rcu_segcblist *cblist = &rdp->cblist;
unsigned long flags;
int wake_gp;
struct rcu_data *rdp_gp = rdp->nocb_gp_rdp;
- /*
- * rcu_nocb_rdp_deoffload() may be called directly if
- * rcuog/o[p] spawn failed, because at this time the rdp->cpu
- * is not online yet.
- */
- WARN_ON_ONCE((rdp->cpu != raw_smp_processor_id()) && cpu_online(rdp->cpu));
+ /* CPU must be offline, unless it's early boot */
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu_online(rdp->cpu) && rdp->cpu != raw_smp_processor_id());
pr_info("De-offloading %d\n", rdp->cpu);
+ /* Flush all callbacks from segcblist and bypass */
+ rcu_barrier();
+
rcu_nocb_lock_irqsave(rdp, flags);
- /*
- * Flush once and for all now. This suffices because we are
- * running on the target CPU holding ->nocb_lock (thus having
- * interrupts disabled), and because rdp_offload_toggle()
- * invokes rcu_segcblist_offload(), which clears SEGCBLIST_OFFLOADED.
- * Thus future calls to rcu_segcblist_completely_offloaded() will
- * return false, which means that future calls to rcu_nocb_try_bypass()
- * will refuse to put anything into the bypass.
- */
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_nocb_flush_bypass(rdp, NULL, jiffies, false));
- /*
- * Start with invoking rcu_core() early. This way if the current thread
- * happens to preempt an ongoing call to rcu_core() in the middle,
- * leaving some work dismissed because rcu_core() still thinks the rdp is
- * completely offloaded, we are guaranteed a nearby future instance of
- * rcu_core() to catch up.
- */
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(rcu_cblist_n_cbs(&rdp->nocb_bypass));
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(rcu_segcblist_n_cbs(&rdp->cblist));
+
rcu_segcblist_set_flags(cblist, SEGCBLIST_RCU_CORE);
- invoke_rcu_core();
wake_gp = rdp_offload_toggle(rdp, false, flags);
mutex_lock(&rdp_gp->nocb_gp_kthread_mutex);
@@ -1128,10 +1111,6 @@ static long rcu_nocb_rdp_deoffload(void *arg)
*/
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rdp->nocb_lock, flags);
- /* Sanity check */
- WARN_ON_ONCE(rcu_cblist_n_cbs(&rdp->nocb_bypass));
-
-
return 0;
}
@@ -1142,18 +1121,16 @@ int rcu_nocb_cpu_deoffload(int cpu)
cpus_read_lock();
mutex_lock(&rcu_state.nocb_mutex);
- mutex_lock(&rcu_state.barrier_mutex);
if (rcu_rdp_is_offloaded(rdp)) {
- if (cpu_online(cpu)) {
- ret = work_on_cpu(cpu, rcu_nocb_rdp_deoffload, rdp);
+ if (!cpu_online(cpu)) {
+ ret = rcu_nocb_rdp_deoffload(rdp);
if (!ret)
cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, rcu_nocb_mask);
} else {
- pr_info("NOCB: Cannot CB-deoffload offline CPU %d\n", rdp->cpu);
+ pr_info("NOCB: Cannot CB-deoffload online CPU %d\n", rdp->cpu);
ret = -EINVAL;
}
}
- mutex_unlock(&rcu_state.barrier_mutex);
mutex_unlock(&rcu_state.nocb_mutex);
cpus_read_unlock();
@@ -1161,15 +1138,14 @@ int rcu_nocb_cpu_deoffload(int cpu)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_nocb_cpu_deoffload);
-static long rcu_nocb_rdp_offload(void *arg)
+static int rcu_nocb_rdp_offload(struct rcu_data *rdp)
{
- struct rcu_data *rdp = arg;
struct rcu_segcblist *cblist = &rdp->cblist;
unsigned long flags;
int wake_gp;
struct rcu_data *rdp_gp = rdp->nocb_gp_rdp;
- WARN_ON_ONCE(rdp->cpu != raw_smp_processor_id());
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu_online(rdp->cpu));
/*
* For now we only support re-offload, ie: the rdp must have been
* offloaded on boot first.
@@ -1182,28 +1158,15 @@ static long rcu_nocb_rdp_offload(void *arg)
pr_info("Offloading %d\n", rdp->cpu);
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(rcu_cblist_n_cbs(&rdp->nocb_bypass));
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(rcu_segcblist_n_cbs(&rdp->cblist));
+
/*
* Can't use rcu_nocb_lock_irqsave() before SEGCBLIST_LOCKING
* is set.
*/
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rdp->nocb_lock, flags);
- /*
- * We didn't take the nocb lock while working on the
- * rdp->cblist with SEGCBLIST_LOCKING cleared (pure softirq/rcuc mode).
- * Every modifications that have been done previously on
- * rdp->cblist must be visible remotely by the nocb kthreads
- * upon wake up after reading the cblist flags.
- *
- * The layout against nocb_lock enforces that ordering:
- *
- * __rcu_nocb_rdp_offload() nocb_cb_wait()/nocb_gp_wait()
- * ------------------------- ----------------------------
- * WRITE callbacks rcu_nocb_lock()
- * rcu_nocb_lock() READ flags
- * WRITE flags READ callbacks
- * rcu_nocb_unlock() rcu_nocb_unlock()
- */
wake_gp = rdp_offload_toggle(rdp, true, flags);
if (wake_gp)
wake_up_process(rdp_gp->nocb_gp_kthread);
@@ -1214,8 +1177,7 @@ static long rcu_nocb_rdp_offload(void *arg)
rcu_segcblist_test_flags(cblist, SEGCBLIST_KTHREAD_GP));
/*
- * All kthreads are ready to work, we can finally relieve rcu_core() and
- * enable nocb bypass.
+ * All kthreads are ready to work, we can finally enable nocb bypass.
*/
rcu_nocb_lock_irqsave(rdp, flags);
rcu_segcblist_clear_flags(cblist, SEGCBLIST_RCU_CORE);
@@ -1231,18 +1193,16 @@ int rcu_nocb_cpu_offload(int cpu)
cpus_read_lock();
mutex_lock(&rcu_state.nocb_mutex);
- mutex_lock(&rcu_state.barrier_mutex);
if (!rcu_rdp_is_offloaded(rdp)) {
- if (cpu_online(cpu)) {
- ret = work_on_cpu(cpu, rcu_nocb_rdp_offload, rdp);
+ if (!cpu_online(cpu)) {
+ ret = rcu_nocb_rdp_offload(rdp);
if (!ret)
cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, rcu_nocb_mask);
} else {
- pr_info("NOCB: Cannot CB-offload offline CPU %d\n", rdp->cpu);
+ pr_info("NOCB: Cannot CB-offload online CPU %d\n", rdp->cpu);
ret = -EINVAL;
}
}
- mutex_unlock(&rcu_state.barrier_mutex);
mutex_unlock(&rcu_state.nocb_mutex);
cpus_read_unlock();
--
2.40.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists