[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zr7hJ9ytXT0G-ZvT@tlindgre-MOBL1>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 08:18:31 +0300
From: Tony Lindgren <tony.lindgren@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
Cc: "Li, Xiaoyao" <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"seanjc@...gle.com" <seanjc@...gle.com>,
"Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>,
"isaku.yamahata@...il.com" <isaku.yamahata@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/25] TDX vCPU/VM creation
On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 11:46:00PM +0000, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-08-15 at 08:20 +0300, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > We can generate a TDX suitable default CPUID configuration by adding
> > KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_TDX_CPUID. This would handled similar to the existing
> > KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID and KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_HV_CPUID.
>
> What problem are you suggesting to solve with it? To give something to userspace
> to say "please filter these out yourself?"
To produce a usable default CPUID set for TDX early on. That's before the
kvm_cpu_caps is initialized in kvm_arch_init_vm(), so I don't think there's
any other way to do it early. That is if we want to prodce a TDX specific
set :)
> From the thread with Sean on this series, it seems maybe we won't need the
> filtering in any case.
Yeah let's see.
> Sorry if I missed your point. KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_HV_CPUID only returns a few
> extra entries associated with HV, right? I'm not following the connection to
> what TDX needs here.
The the code to handle would be common except for the TDX specific CPUID
filtering call.
Regards,
Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists