[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240816122938.32228-4-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 12:29:35 +0000
From: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Yongwei Ma <yongwei.ma@...el.com>,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...el.com>,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [Patch v4 3/6] perf x86/topdown: Don't move topdown metric events in group
when running below perf command, we say error is reported.
perf record -e "{slots,instructions,topdown-retiring}:S" -vv -C0 sleep 1
------------------------------------------------------------
perf_event_attr:
type 4 (cpu)
size 168
config 0x400 (slots)
sample_type IP|TID|TIME|READ|CPU|PERIOD|IDENTIFIER
read_format ID|GROUP|LOST
disabled 1
sample_id_all 1
exclude_guest 1
------------------------------------------------------------
sys_perf_event_open: pid -1 cpu 0 group_fd -1 flags 0x8 = 5
------------------------------------------------------------
perf_event_attr:
type 4 (cpu)
size 168
config 0x8000 (topdown-retiring)
{ sample_period, sample_freq } 4000
sample_type IP|TID|TIME|READ|CPU|PERIOD|IDENTIFIER
read_format ID|GROUP|LOST
freq 1
sample_id_all 1
exclude_guest 1
------------------------------------------------------------
sys_perf_event_open: pid -1 cpu 0 group_fd 5 flags 0x8
sys_perf_event_open failed, error -22
Error:
The sys_perf_event_open() syscall returned with 22 (Invalid argument) for
event (topdown-retiring).
The reason of error is that the events are regrouped and
topdown-retiring event is moved to closely after the slots event and
topdown-retiring event needs to do the sampling, but Intel PMU driver
doesn't support to sample topdown metrics events.
For topdown metrics events, it just requires to be in a group which has
slots event as leader. It doesn't require topdown metrics event must be
closely after slots event. Thus it's a overkill to move topdown metrics
event closely after slots event in events regrouping and furtherly cause
the above issue.
Thus don't move topdown metrics events forward if they are already in a
group.
Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>
---
tools/perf/arch/x86/util/evlist.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/evlist.c b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/evlist.c
index 332e8907f43e..b8a38c0ca36d 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/evlist.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/evlist.c
@@ -75,6 +75,61 @@ int arch_evlist__add_default_attrs(struct evlist *evlist,
int arch_evlist__cmp(const struct evsel *lhs, const struct evsel *rhs)
{
+ /*
+ * Currently the following topdown events sequence are supported to
+ * move and regroup correctly.
+ *
+ * a. all events in a group
+ * perf stat -e "{instructions,topdown-retiring,slots}" -C0 sleep 1
+ * WARNING: events were regrouped to match PMUs
+ * Performance counter stats for 'CPU(s) 0':
+ * 15,066,240 slots
+ * 1,899,760 instructions
+ * 2,126,998 topdown-retiring
+ * b. all events not in a group
+ * perf stat -e "instructions,topdown-retiring,slots" -C0 sleep 1
+ * WARNING: events were regrouped to match PMUs
+ * Performance counter stats for 'CPU(s) 0':
+ * 2,045,561 instructions
+ * 17,108,370 slots
+ * 2,281,116 topdown-retiring
+ * c. slots event in a group but topdown metrics events outside the group
+ * perf stat -e "{instructions,slots},topdown-retiring" -C0 sleep 1
+ * WARNING: events were regrouped to match PMUs
+ * Performance counter stats for 'CPU(s) 0':
+ * 20,323,878 slots
+ * 2,634,884 instructions
+ * 3,028,656 topdown-retiring
+ * d. slots event and topdown metrics events in two groups
+ * perf stat -e "{instructions,slots},{topdown-retiring}" -C0 sleep 1
+ * WARNING: events were regrouped to match PMUs
+ * Performance counter stats for 'CPU(s) 0':
+ * 26,319,024 slots
+ * 2,427,791 instructions
+ * 2,683,508 topdown-retiring
+ *
+ * If slots event and topdown metrics events are not in same group, the
+ * topdown metrics events must be first event after the slots event group,
+ * otherwise topdown metrics events can't be regrouped correctly, e.g.
+ *
+ * a. perf stat -e "{instructions,slots},cycles,topdown-retiring" -C0 sleep 1
+ * WARNING: events were regrouped to match PMUs
+ * Performance counter stats for 'CPU(s) 0':
+ * 17,923,134 slots
+ * 2,154,855 instructions
+ * 3,015,058 cycles
+ * <not supported> topdown-retiring
+ *
+ * if slots event and topdown metrics events are in two groups, the group which
+ * has topdown metrics events must contain only the topdown metrics event,
+ * otherwise topdown metrics event can't be regrouped correctly as well, e.g.
+ *
+ * a. perf stat -e "{instructions,slots},{topdown-retiring,cycles}" -C0 sleep 1
+ * WARNING: events were regrouped to match PMUs
+ * Error:
+ * The sys_perf_event_open() syscall returned with 22 (Invalid argument) for
+ * event (topdown-retiring)
+ */
if (topdown_sys_has_perf_metrics() &&
(arch_evsel__must_be_in_group(lhs) || arch_evsel__must_be_in_group(rhs))) {
/* Ensure the topdown slots comes first. */
@@ -85,7 +140,12 @@ int arch_evlist__cmp(const struct evsel *lhs, const struct evsel *rhs)
/* Followed by topdown events. */
if (arch_is_topdown_metrics(lhs) && !arch_is_topdown_metrics(rhs))
return -1;
- if (!arch_is_topdown_metrics(lhs) && arch_is_topdown_metrics(rhs))
+ /*
+ * Move topdown events forward only when topdown events
+ * are not in same group with previous event.
+ */
+ if (!arch_is_topdown_metrics(lhs) && arch_is_topdown_metrics(rhs) &&
+ lhs->core.leader != rhs->core.leader)
return 1;
}
--
2.40.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists