[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2517e284-88d0-4cf3-97cf-55567f35eb82@rock-chips.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 08:43:48 +0800
From: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>
To: Detlev Casanova <detlev.casanova@...labora.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: shawn.lin@...k-chips.com, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] mmc: dw_mmc-rockchip: Add v2 tuning support
在 2024/8/15 21:23, Detlev Casanova 写道:
> On Wednesday, 14 August 2024 20:55:37 EDT Shawn Lin wrote:
>> Hi Detlev
>>
>> 在 2024/8/15 6:34, Detlev Casanova 写道:
>>> From: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>
>>>
>>> v2 tuning will inherit pre-stage loader's phase settings for the first
>>> time, and do re-tune if necessary.
>>> Re-tune will still try the rough degrees, for instance, 90, 180, 270,
>>> 360 but continue to do the fine tuning if sample window isn't good
>>> enough.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Detlev Casanova <detlev.casanova@...labora.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-rockchip.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-rockchip.c
>>> b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-rockchip.c index b07190ba4b7ac..367633f4e8892
>>> 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-rockchip.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-rockchip.c
>
> [...]
>
>>>
>>> priv->default_sample_phase = 0;
>>>
>>> + priv->use_v2_tuning =
>>> + of_device_is_compatible(host->dev->of_node,
>>> + "rockchip,rk3576-dw-
> mshc");
>>> +
>>
>> v2 is a kind of software decision instead of hardware dependency.
>> So in theory, any SoC can claim to use it via DT.
>
> Yes but from my tests, only rk3576 won't work without it. So it makes sense to
> only use v2 for this SoC (and other future ones not supported yet)
>
However from both of the IC design POV and the test from my side,
we just need internal phase support patch, and rk3576 could
work.
>>
>>> priv->drv_clk = devm_clk_get(host->dev, "ciu-drive");
>>> if (IS_ERR(priv->drv_clk))
>>>
>>> dev_dbg(host->dev, "ciu-drive not available\n");
>
>
> Detlev.
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists