[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zr8ma7pt7te0qxNG@J2N7QTR9R3>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 11:14:03 +0100
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc: will@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ilkka@...amperecomputing.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] perf/arm-cmn: Ensure dtm_idx is big enough
On Fri, Aug 09, 2024 at 08:15:42PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> While CMN_MAX_DIMENSION was bumped to 12 for CMN-650, that only supports
> up to a 10x10 mesh, so bumping dtm_idx to 256 bits at the time worked
> out OK in practice. However CMN-700 did finally support up to 144 XPs,
> and thus needs a worst-case 288 bits of dtm_idx for an aggregated XP
> event on a maxed-out config. Oops.
>
> Fixes: 23760a014417 ("perf/arm-cmn: Add CMN-700 support")
> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
> ---
> drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c b/drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c
> index 0e2e12e2f4fb..c9a2b21a7aec 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c
> @@ -563,7 +563,7 @@ static void arm_cmn_debugfs_init(struct arm_cmn *cmn, int id) {}
>
> struct arm_cmn_hw_event {
> struct arm_cmn_node *dn;
> - u64 dtm_idx[4];
> + u64 dtm_idx[5];
Can't we size this based on CMN_MAX_DIMENSION (or CMN_MAX_XPS or
CMN_MAX_DTMS), to make that clear?
>From the desciription in the commit message it sounds like you need 2 *
CMN_MAX_XPS bits, i.e.
#define DTM_IDX_BITS (2 * CMN_MAX_XPS)
u64 dtm_idx[DIV_ROUND_UP(DTM_IDX_BITS, 64)];
Mark.
> s8 dtc_idx[CMN_MAX_DTCS];
> u8 num_dns;
> u8 dtm_offset;
> --
> 2.39.2.101.g768bb238c484.dirty
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists