linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] dt-bindings: phy: Add X1E80100 UFS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <094264f7-a0b8-43f7-a405-305afb0d44e9@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2024 09:42:51 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Marcus Glocker <marcus@...gul.ch>, Bjorn Andersson
 <andersson@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
 linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>,
 Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>, Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] dt-bindings: phy: Add X1E80100 UFS

On 17/08/2024 09:09, Marcus Glocker wrote:
> Document the qmp ufs phy compatible for the Qualcomm X1E80100.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marcus Glocker <marcus@...gul.ch>

<form letter>
This is a friendly reminder during the review process.

It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.

If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
versions, under or above your Signed-off-by tag. Tag is "received", when
provided in a message replied to you on the mailing list. Tools like b4
can help here. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add
the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for tags received on the
version they apply.

https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.5-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577

If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
</form letter>

I guess this applies everywhere...

Best regards,
Krzysztof